9/11 Truths

Notes from the Top Secret briefing early morning, Sept 11, 2001,
Livermore.

"People are so calm about this...it's shocking not only at the low-key
way it was announced, but at the comparative apparent lack of
reaction of many of my colleagues."


¡E The planes that hit the twin towers are remotely
controlled (over-riding the pilots, and with software
modifications that would permit tight turns that would normally
be impossible due to autopilot default limit settings). The remote
control was enacted from thousands of miles away via Bell's Theorem.

¡E The plane that hit the Pentagon will be a small, remotely piloted
Navy
jet. A full-sized Boeing 757 could not have been used because the
aerodynamic ground effects would have prevented it coming in so
low at full speed without it having to slow right down as if to
land.

¡E The well-publicized cellphone calls would be fabricated.

¡E Control over Flight 93, which either crashed or was shot
down over Pennsylvania, would be lost, and that that part of
the plan had gone wrong (there had been another targeted building).

¡E What had happened to the passengers and the plane of Flight 77
(the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon), UNKNOWN.

¡E Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with any of it apart from the fact
that he was a USG asset.

In article ,
Quaalude wrote:

Notes from the Top Secret briefing early morning, Sept 11, 2001,
Livermore.

"People are so calm about this...it's shocking not only at the low-key
way it was announced, but at the comparative apparent lack of
reaction of many of my colleagues."


¡E The planes that hit the twin towers are remotely
controlled (over-riding the pilots, and with software
modifications that would permit tight turns that would normally
be impossible due to autopilot default limit settings). The remote
control was enacted from thousands of miles away via Bell's Theorem.

¡E The plane that hit the Pentagon will be a small, remotely piloted
Navy
jet. A full-sized Boeing 757 could not have been used because the
aerodynamic ground effects would have prevented it coming in so
low at full speed without it having to slow right down as if to
land.

¡E The well-publicized cellphone calls would be fabricated.

¡E Control over Flight 93, which either crashed or was shot
down over Pennsylvania, would be lost, and that that part of
the plan had gone wrong (there had been another targeted building).

¡E What had happened to the passengers and the plane of Flight 77
(the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon), UNKNOWN.

¡E Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with any of it apart from the fact
that he was a USG asset.




Yet more KOOK-A-DOODLE-DOO!

buy propecia generic, order propecia dht.

buy propecia 5mg online - buy propecia online us.

order propecia with paypal, buy propecia generic.

buy propecia merck, buy propecia europe.

order propecia pharmcom - order propecia by merck.

cheap propecia, can i get propecia on prescription.

order propecia online in canada, buy propecia at boots.

order propecia 1mg - where to buy propecia in ireland.

where to buy propecia in australia, cheap propecia tablets.

On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:26:04 -0400, Quaalude wrote:

Notes from the Top Secret briefing early morning, Sept 11, 2001,
Livermore.

"People are so calm about this...it's shocking not only at the low-key
way it was announced, but at the comparative apparent lack of
reaction of many of my colleagues."

¡E The planes that hit the twin towers are remotely
controlled (over-riding the pilots, and with software
modifications that would permit tight turns that would normally
be impossible due to autopilot default limit settings). The remote
control was enacted from thousands of miles away via Bell's Theorem.

¡E The plane that hit the Pentagon will be a small, remotely piloted
Navy
jet. A full-sized Boeing 757 could not have been used because the
aerodynamic ground effects would have prevented it coming in so
low at full speed without it having to slow right down as if to
land.

¡E The well-publicized cellphone calls would be fabricated.

¡E Control over Flight 93, which either crashed or was shot
down over Pennsylvania, would be lost, and that that part of
the plan had gone wrong (there had been another targeted building).

¡E What had happened to the passengers and the plane of Flight 77
(the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon), UNKNOWN.

¡E Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with any of it apart from the fact
that he was a USG asset.

www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Deacon_01.pdf

On Sep 22, 7:26*pm, Quaalude wrote:
Notes from the Top Secret briefing early morning, Sept 11, 2001,
Livermore.

"People are so calm about this...it's shocking not only at the low-key
way it was *announced, *but *at *the *comparative *apparent *lack *of
reaction *of *many *of *my colleagues."

E * The *planes *that *hit *the *twin *towers *are *remotely
controlled *(over-riding *the pilots, *and *with *software
modifications *that *would *permit *tight *turns *that *would normally
be impossible due to autopilot default limit settings). The remote
control was enacted from thousands of miles away via Bell's Theorem.

E *The plane that hit the Pentagon will be a small, remotely piloted
Navy
jet. A full-sized Boeing 757 could not have been used because the
aerodynamic ground effects would *have *prevented *it *coming *in *so
low *at *full *speed without *it *having *to *slow right down as if to
land.

E *The well-publicized cellphone calls would be fabricated.

E * Control *over *Flight *93, *which *either crashed *or *was *shot
down *over *Pennsylvania, *would be lost, *and that *that *part *of
the *plan *had *gone wrong (there had been another targeted building).

E *What had happened to the passengers and the plane of Flight 77
(the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon), UNKNOWN.

E *Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with any of it apart from the fact
that he was a USG asset. *

Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
Dudley Henriques

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:

Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
Dudley Henriques

Huh?

Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
Henriques?

On Oct 4, 2:21*pm, Tom wrote:
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
Dudley Henriques

Huh?

Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
Henriques?

Dudley, it's unfortunate that there are people stupid enough to
actually believe these claims. Otherwise it's pretty funny. I wonder
if these same people tune in to Saturday Night Live and see the first
skit and think they really are watching a Presidential news
conference?

In article , Tom
wrote:

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:

Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
Dudley Henriques

Huh?

Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
Henriques?

Tom, why don't you challenge Dudley to an aerial dogfight duel? If you
are so **** hot as you claim to be, you should be able to wax him in
minutes. If not, we are rid of another fool poseur.