![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/24/2012 11:16 PM, glidergeek wrote:
On Feb 11, 8:29 am, John wrote: Daryldhunt nospami70west3.com wrote: John Doe wrote: Our special forces take risks like that Wrong, Bull****. As dangerous as a Specops mission is, You just contradicted yourself. they are well thought out and executed and normally are highly successful. Well thought out and risky = difficult. SF is rarely a bunch of hotdogs. You mean like on TV? Of course not. Then again, Jeb Corliss doesn't use a stuntman or props. They know their job and do it probably beyond human capability Are you in a movie? but chance takers they aren't. You are playing semantics. I'm not interested in playing semantics. -- When it appears that it's impossible means they failed somewhere along the way and their people die in the process. When it looks almost supernatural in the success, it's from superior planning and execution of the mission. Almost all missions have been successful. Then you should go away instead of coming here if your objective is to challenge people if you don't get satisfaction to your question. Likewise if you don't like the answer to your question don't ask it. I didn't ask the original question. And as for going away, are you going to grab my left wrist that I am typing with and wrench it to force me to go away? -- http://tvmoviesforfree.com for free movies and Nostalgic TV. Tons of Military shows and programs. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 10:59*pm, Daryl wrote:
On 3/24/2012 11:16 PM, glidergeek wrote: On Feb 11, 8:29 am, John *wrote: Daryldhunt nospami70west3.com *wrote: John Doe wrote: Our special forces take risks like that Wrong, Bull****. As dangerous as a Specops mission is, You just contradicted yourself. they are well thought out and executed and normally are highly successful. Well thought out and risky = difficult. SF is rarely a bunch of hotdogs. You mean like on TV? Of course not. Then again, Jeb Corliss doesn't use a stuntman or props. They know their job and do it probably beyond human capability Are you in a movie? but chance takers they aren't. You are playing semantics. I'm not interested in playing semantics. -- When it appears that it's impossible means they failed somewhere along the way and their people die in the process. *When it looks almost supernatural in the success, it's from superior planning and execution of the mission. *Almost all missions have been successful. Then you should go away instead of coming here if your objective is to challenge people if you don't get satisfaction to your question. Likewise if you don't like the answer to your question don't ask it. I didn't ask the original question. *And as for going away, are you going to grab my left wrist that I am typing with and wrench it to force me to go away? --http://tvmoviesforfree.com for free movies and Nostalgic TV. *Tons of Military shows and programs. Sorry Daryl I didn't mean you I meant the original poster. He came onto a usernet hiding behind a false name and a keyboard asked a controversial question with the intent of starting **** and and succeeded well. Lookit he sucked in at least 70 responses. He's smiling thinking what a bunch of looser gliderpilots. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 10:59*pm, Daryl wrote:
On 3/24/2012 11:16 PM, glidergeek wrote: On Feb 11, 8:29 am, John *wrote: Daryldhunt nospami70west3.com *wrote: John Doe wrote: Our special forces take risks like that Wrong, Bull****. As dangerous as a Specops mission is, You just contradicted yourself. they are well thought out and executed and normally are highly successful. Well thought out and risky = difficult. SF is rarely a bunch of hotdogs. You mean like on TV? Of course not. Then again, Jeb Corliss doesn't use a stuntman or props. They know their job and do it probably beyond human capability Are you in a movie? but chance takers they aren't. You are playing semantics. I'm not interested in playing semantics. -- When it appears that it's impossible means they failed somewhere along the way and their people die in the process. *When it looks almost supernatural in the success, it's from superior planning and execution of the mission. *Almost all missions have been successful. Then you should go away instead of coming here if your objective is to challenge people if you don't get satisfaction to your question. Likewise if you don't like the answer to your question don't ask it. I didn't ask the original question. *And as for going away, are you going to grab my left wrist that I am typing with and wrench it to force me to go away? --http://tvmoviesforfree.com for free movies and Nostalgic TV. *Tons of Military shows and programs. Sorry Daryl I didn't mean you I meant the "John Doe" The little guy hiding behind the keyboard and the alias. He came onto this site with intention of starting **** and didn't like that he didn't get the answer he wanted. He sucked all he could into this with a stupid question. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/25/2012 9:06 AM, glidergeek wrote:
On Mar 24, 10:59 pm, wrote: On 3/24/2012 11:16 PM, glidergeek wrote: On Feb 11, 8:29 am, John wrote: Daryldhunt nospami70west3.com wrote: John Doe wrote: Our special forces take risks like that Wrong, Bull****. As dangerous as a Specops mission is, You just contradicted yourself. they are well thought out and executed and normally are highly successful. Well thought out and risky = difficult. SF is rarely a bunch of hotdogs. You mean like on TV? Of course not. Then again, Jeb Corliss doesn't use a stuntman or props. They know their job and do it probably beyond human capability Are you in a movie? but chance takers they aren't. You are playing semantics. I'm not interested in playing semantics. -- When it appears that it's impossible means they failed somewhere along the way and their people die in the process. When it looks almost supernatural in the success, it's from superior planning and execution of the mission. Almost all missions have been successful. Then you should go away instead of coming here if your objective is to challenge people if you don't get satisfaction to your question. Likewise if you don't like the answer to your question don't ask it. I didn't ask the original question. And as for going away, are you going to grab my left wrist that I am typing with and wrench it to force me to go away? --http://tvmoviesforfree.com for free movies and Nostalgic TV. Tons of Military shows and programs. Sorry Daryl I didn't mean you I meant the "John Doe" The little guy hiding behind the keyboard and the alias. He came onto this site with intention of starting **** and didn't like that he didn't get the answer he wanted. He sucked all he could into this with a stupid question. Not a prob. Misunderstandings do happen. -- http://tvmoviesforfree.com for free movies and Nostalgic TV. Tons of Military shows and programs. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 25, 11:01*am, glidergeek wrote:
On Mar 24, 10:59*pm, Daryl wrote: On 3/24/2012 11:16 PM, glidergeek wrote: On Feb 11, 8:29 am, John *wrote: Daryldhunt nospami70west3.com *wrote: John Doe wrote: Our special forces take risks like that Wrong, Bull****. As dangerous as a Specops mission is, You just contradicted yourself. they are well thought out and executed and normally are highly successful. Well thought out and risky = difficult. SF is rarely a bunch of hotdogs. You mean like on TV? Of course not. Then again, Jeb Corliss doesn't use a stuntman or props. They know their job and do it probably beyond human capability Are you in a movie? but chance takers they aren't. You are playing semantics. I'm not interested in playing semantics. -- When it appears that it's impossible means they failed somewhere along the way and their people die in the process. *When it looks almost supernatural in the success, it's from superior planning and execution of the mission. *Almost all missions have been successful. Then you should go away instead of coming here if your objective is to challenge people if you don't get satisfaction to your question. Likewise if you don't like the answer to your question don't ask it. I didn't ask the original question. *And as for going away, are you going to grab my left wrist that I am typing with and wrench it to force me to go away? --http://tvmoviesforfree.com for free movies and Nostalgic TV. *Tons of Military shows and programs. Sorry Daryl I didn't mean you I meant the original poster. *He came onto a usernet hiding behind a false name and a keyboard asked a controversial question with the intent of starting **** and and succeeded well. Lookit he sucked in at least 70 responses. He's smiling thinking what a bunch of looser gliderpilots. Actually, he sparked a very good discussion when you filter and ignore the normal garbage. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 25, 1:12*pm, Dean wrote:
On Mar 25, 11:01*am, glidergeek wrote: On Mar 24, 10:59*pm, Daryl wrote: On 3/24/2012 11:16 PM, glidergeek wrote: On Feb 11, 8:29 am, John *wrote: Daryldhunt nospami70west3.com *wrote: John Doe wrote: Our special forces take risks like that Wrong, Bull****. As dangerous as a Specops mission is, You just contradicted yourself. they are well thought out and executed and normally are highly successful. Well thought out and risky = difficult. SF is rarely a bunch of hotdogs. You mean like on TV? Of course not. Then again, Jeb Corliss doesn't use a stuntman or props. They know their job and do it probably beyond human capability Are you in a movie? but chance takers they aren't. You are playing semantics. I'm not interested in playing semantics.. -- When it appears that it's impossible means they failed somewhere along the way and their people die in the process. *When it looks almost supernatural in the success, it's from superior planning and execution of the mission. *Almost all missions have been successful. Then you should go away instead of coming here if your objective is to challenge people if you don't get satisfaction to your question. Likewise if you don't like the answer to your question don't ask it.. I didn't ask the original question. *And as for going away, are you going to grab my left wrist that I am typing with and wrench it to force me to go away? --http://tvmoviesforfree.com for free movies and Nostalgic TV. *Tons of Military shows and programs. Sorry Daryl I didn't mean you I meant the original poster. *He came onto a usernet hiding behind a false name and a keyboard asked a controversial question with the intent of starting **** and and succeeded well. Lookit he sucked in at least 70 responses. He's smiling thinking what a bunch of looser gliderpilots. Actually, he sparked a very good discussion when you filter and ignore the normal garbage. Dean truthfully anybody that has the physically strength and hand eye coordination could do that. Would anybody do what Jeb does? obviously not and I've got both my knee caps have never broken my legs and have made it to 59 1/2 y/o. I'm a low time pilot 2500 hrs if each "wing suit" flight is only 6 minutes at longest he will have to make, check my math 25,000 flights to have as much fun as I've had. but I'll bet he's made more money doing what he does than I've spent on what I like doing. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How difficult, Jeb Corliss wing suit stunt? | John Doe[_4_] | Piloting | 80 | March 26th 12 05:09 PM |
Stunt pilots killed in Polish air crash | Stretch | Aviation Photos | 0 | September 6th 07 04:40 PM |
How to deal with a difficult DE? | Mark | Piloting | 15 | August 19th 04 12:21 AM |
Difficult Strips | C J Campbell | Piloting | 6 | August 11th 04 08:04 PM |
How to Stunt Circle a Barn. | [email protected] | Piloting | 15 | March 19th 04 03:14 AM |