Bush Made Sure 9/11 Would Happen--The Novel

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 01 May 2004 11:09:10 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 03:23:07 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:

You did not collectively respond to this direct rebuttal of your
claims?

Ah, but I did, at least the most important point. Your "rebuttal"
wasn't worth the effort.

Huh, you made your feeble post about many (12+) alleged FAA
Misconceptions

Actually, Bryan, they were your misconceptions.

Ok, if you say so because it makes you feel better. The fact remains you
clarified nothing. You have no concept of FAA Procedures as this post of
yours (FAA Misconceptions) demonstrates.

I have a lot better understanding of the procedures than you do.
You're on record as having said that FAA procedures don't require
NORAD to launch fighters. Sort of hard to get past that fact.

Sort of hard for you to get past the fact that this is not what I said. I
don't think you can quote me liar. Produce the link to that quote!!

Here is what I stated: " True: FAA regulations do not specifically tell
NORAD to scramble AC. FAA Procedures explain what duties NORAD are during
the intercept". You ****. You are disingenuous at best.



















You are the lowest form of life around besides a pedophile. You might
actually be a convicted pedophile who is miserable that he isn't getting
any.



--
It's obvious to me that the country has rapidly divided itself into two
camps. There are the wimps and apologists who want to continue supporting
those who failed to protect the America Citizens from an attack on such a
grand scale- then there are the real flag bearers who want to hold them
accountable for their failures and finger pointing constituting major
contradictions between themselves resulting in a huge cover up.

On Sat, 01 May 2004 20:44:27 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 01 May 2004 11:09:10 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 03:23:07 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:

You did not collectively respond to this direct rebuttal of your
claims?

Ah, but I did, at least the most important point. Your "rebuttal"
wasn't worth the effort.

Huh, you made your feeble post about many (12+) alleged FAA
Misconceptions

Actually, Bryan, they were your misconceptions.

Ok, if you say so because it makes you feel better. The fact remains you
clarified nothing. You have no concept of FAA Procedures as this post of
yours (FAA Misconceptions) demonstrates.

I have a lot better understanding of the procedures than you do.
You're on record as having said that FAA procedures don't require
NORAD to launch fighters. Sort of hard to get past that fact.

Sort of hard for you to get past the fact that this is not what I said. I
don't think you can quote me liar. Produce the link to that quote!!

Here is what I stated: " True: FAA regulations do not specifically tell
NORAD to scramble AC. FAA Procedures explain what duties NORAD are during
the intercept". You ****. You are disingenuous at best.

Er, Bryan, if the FAA procedures "do not specifically tell NORAD to
scramble AC", then they obviously do not require NORAD to launch
fighters. You can try to dance your way out of what you said all day,
but you can't do it.


You are the lowest form of life around besides a pedophile. You might
actually be a convicted pedophile who is miserable that he isn't getting
any.

ROTFLMAO. And you are a house painter who is obviously miserable that
he isn't getting any. Maybe you should call Melanie, she seems to be
between husbands at the moment.

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 01 May 2004 20:44:27 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 01 May 2004 11:09:10 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 03:23:07 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:

You did not collectively respond to this direct rebuttal of your
claims?

Ah, but I did, at least the most important point. Your
"rebuttal"
wasn't worth the effort.

Huh, you made your feeble post about many (12+) alleged FAA
Misconceptions

Actually, Bryan, they were your misconceptions.

Ok, if you say so because it makes you feel better. The fact remains
you
clarified nothing. You have no concept of FAA Procedures as this post
of
yours (FAA Misconceptions) demonstrates.

I have a lot better understanding of the procedures than you do.
You're on record as having said that FAA procedures don't require
NORAD to launch fighters. Sort of hard to get past that fact.

Sort of hard for you to get past the fact that this is not what I said. I
don't think you can quote me liar. Produce the link to that quote!!

Here is what I stated: " True: FAA regulations do not specifically tell
NORAD to scramble AC. FAA Procedures explain what duties NORAD are during
the intercept". You ****. You are disingenuous at best.

Er, Bryan, if the FAA procedures "do not specifically tell NORAD to
scramble AC", then they obviously do not require NORAD to launch
fighters.

Wrong!


You can try to dance your way out of what you said all day,
but you can't do it.

I don't need to dance. The facts are the facts and they certainly aren't
what you are ultimately claiming.



You are the lowest form of life around besides a pedophile. You might
actually be a convicted pedophile who is miserable that he isn't getting
any.

ROTFLMAO. And you are a house painter who is obviously miserable that
he isn't getting any. Maybe you should call Melanie, she seems to be
between husbands at the moment.

You think you know who I am and what I do, you do not. You desperarately
tried to determine who I was becuase you were tired of being ridiculed. You
deserve it,
agent86. snicker

I now will shortly return to my honey for an afternoon slumber in between
the LA SA Game on ABC. snicker

On Sun, 02 May 2004 21:54:23 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


I have a lot better understanding of the procedures than you do.
You're on record as having said that FAA procedures don't require
NORAD to launch fighters. Sort of hard to get past that fact.

Sort of hard for you to get past the fact that this is not what I said. I
don't think you can quote me liar. Produce the link to that quote!!

Here is what I stated: " True: FAA regulations do not specifically tell
NORAD to scramble AC. FAA Procedures explain what duties NORAD are during
the intercept". You ****. You are disingenuous at best.

Er, Bryan, if the FAA procedures "do not specifically tell NORAD to
scramble AC", then they obviously do not require NORAD to launch
fighters.

Wrong!

Maybe you need to elaborate on how nonexistent procedures can cause
something to happen.

You can try to dance your way out of what you said all day,
but you can't do it.

I don't need to dance. The facts are the facts and they certainly aren't
what you are ultimately claiming.

Yes, Bryan, they are.

You are the lowest form of life around besides a pedophile. You might
actually be a convicted pedophile who is miserable that he isn't getting
any.

ROTFLMAO. And you are a house painter who is obviously miserable that
he isn't getting any. Maybe you should call Melanie, she seems to be
between husbands at the moment.

You think you know who I am and what I do, you do not. You desperarately
tried to determine who I was becuase you were tired of being ridiculed. You
deserve it,

Actually, Bryan, you sent me an email that allowed your
identification.

I now will shortly return to my honey for an afternoon slumber in between
the LA SA Game on ABC. snicker

Yeah, Bryan, that's commonly called a wet dream. BTW, are you still
frequenting the porn newsgroups?

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 May 2004 21:54:23 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


I have a lot better understanding of the procedures than you do.
You're on record as having said that FAA procedures don't require
NORAD to launch fighters. Sort of hard to get past that fact.

Sort of hard for you to get past the fact that this is not what I
said. I
don't think you can quote me liar. Produce the link to that quote!!

Here is what I stated: " True: FAA regulations do not specifically
tell
NORAD to scramble AC. FAA Procedures explain what duties NORAD are
during
the intercept". You ****. You are disingenuous at best.

Er, Bryan, if the FAA procedures "do not specifically tell NORAD to
scramble AC", then they obviously do not require NORAD to launch
fighters.

Wrong!

Maybe you need to elaborate on how nonexistent procedures can cause
something to happen.

snicker




You can try to dance your way out of what you said all day,
but you can't do it.

I don't need to dance. The facts are the facts and they certainly aren't
what you are ultimately claiming.

Yes, Bryan, they are.

Absolutely and they once again show you to be a putz.
http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&l...net%26rnum%3D2


You are the lowest form of life around besides a pedophile. You might
actually be a convicted pedophile who is miserable that he isn't
getting
any.

ROTFLMAO. And you are a house painter who is obviously miserable that
he isn't getting any. Maybe you should call Melanie, she seems to be
between husbands at the moment.

You think you know who I am and what I do, you do not. You desperarately
tried to determine who I was becuase you were tired of being ridiculed.
You
deserve it,

Actually, Bryan, you sent me an email that allowed your
identification.

Even if this is true, it still doesn't reveal my identification no matter.
Again, You think you know who I am and what I do, you do not. You
desperarately tried to determine who I was becuase you were tired of being
ridiculed. I still ridicule you and your foolishness.



I now will shortly return to my honey for an afternoon slumber in between
the LA SA Game on ABC. snicker

Yeah, Bryan, that's commonly called a wet dream. BTW, are you still
frequenting the porn newsgroups?

snicker
It is my reality, your wet dream, ****. You need to view some porn and join
in on the billion dollar industy here in America. snicker

Half O Fag loser ridiculed again

--
It's obvious to me that the country has rapidly divided itself into two
camps. There are the wimps and apologists who want to continue supporting
those who failed to protect the America Citizens from an attack on such a
grand scale- then there are the real flag bearers who want to hold them
accountable for their failures and finger pointing constituting major
contradictions between themselves resulting in a huge cover up.

On Tue, 04 May 2004 15:16:11 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


Maybe you need to elaborate on how nonexistent procedures can cause
something to happen.

snicker

I see as usual, you can't.

You can try to dance your way out of what you said all day,
but you can't do it.

I don't need to dance. The facts are the facts and they certainly aren't
what you are ultimately claiming.

Yes, Bryan, they are.

Absolutely and they once again show you to be a putz.
http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&l...net%26rnum%3D2

Which only demonstrates your stupidity, Bryan.

snip

Actually, Bryan, you sent me an email that allowed your
identification.

Even if this is true,

And it is.

it still doesn't reveal my identification no matter.

But it provided enough information to do a little detective work.

Again, You think you know who I am and what I do, you do not. You
desperarately tried to determine who I was becuase you were tired of being
ridiculed. I still ridicule you and your foolishness.

Denial is a river in Egypt, Bryan.

I now will shortly return to my honey for an afternoon slumber in between
the LA SA Game on ABC. snicker

Yeah, Bryan, that's commonly called a wet dream. BTW, are you still
frequenting the porn newsgroups?

snicker
It is my reality, your wet dream, ****. You need to view some porn and join
in on the billion dollar industy here in America. snicker

So you admit that you frequent to porn groups. How nice.

wrote in message
news
On Tue, 04 May 2004 15:16:11 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


Maybe you need to elaborate on how nonexistent procedures can cause
something to happen.

snicker

I see as usual, you can't.

I will not answer a preposterous disingenuous question. Because you shriek
non existent procedures doesn't make it so. You haven't shown any validity
with this shriek though you have repeatedly parsed. The question is, will
you repeatedly demonstrate your feeble attempt in this matter.
snicker

You do understand now that you have been exposed as a net kook.

Here is what I stated: " True: FAA regulations do not specifically tell
NORAD to scramble AC. FAA Procedures explain what duties NORAD are during
the intercept".






You can try to dance your way out of what you said all day,
but you can't do it.

I don't need to dance. The facts are the facts and they certainly
aren't
what you are ultimately claiming.

Yes, Bryan, they are.

Absolutely and they once again show you to be a putz.

Which only demonstrates your stupidity, Bryan.

snicker

There is only one list you have provided (which I rebutted and you
ignored collectively) and as anyone can see there is more confusion on your
end explaining FAA Procedural Misconceptions. In most instances you didn't
even mention the FAA misconceptions or explained what part of a procedure is
causing the misconception as it specifically reads. snicker

http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&l...net%26rnum%3D1

On Wed, 05 May 2004 15:51:47 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


wrote in message
news
On Tue, 04 May 2004 15:16:11 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


Maybe you need to elaborate on how nonexistent procedures can cause
something to happen.

I see as usual, you can't.

I will not answer a preposterous disingenuous question.

Mostly because you can't.

Because you shriek
non existent procedures doesn't make it so.

I "shriek" nothing, Bryan. You are the one who says the procedures
that require NORAD to scramble planes don't exist.

ROTFLMAO.

Here is what I stated: " True: FAA regulations do not specifically tell
NORAD to scramble AC. FAA Procedures explain what duties NORAD are during
the intercept".

And with no FAA procedures requiring NORAD to scramble, it's kind of
hard to follow those nonexistent procedures and have a successful
intercept.

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 05 May 2004 15:51:47 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


wrote in message
news
On Tue, 04 May 2004 15:16:11 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


Maybe you need to elaborate on how nonexistent procedures can cause
something to happen.

I see as usual, you can't.

I will not answer a preposterous disingenuous question.

Mostly because you can't.

Totally becuase it is a preposterous disingenuous question.


Because you shriek
non existent procedures doesn't make it so.

I "shriek" nothing, Bryan. You are the one who says the procedures
that require NORAD to scramble planes don't exist.

snicker


ROTFLMAO.

Here is what I stated: " True: FAA regulations do not specifically tell
NORAD to scramble AC. FAA Procedures explain what duties NORAD are during
the intercept".

And with no FAA procedures requiring NORAD to scramble, it's kind of
hard to follow those nonexistent procedures and have a successful
intercept.

Simply fascinating! "Do not specifically tell" equates to nonexistent in
your world.

"copprtopkiller" wrote in message
.net...

wrote in message
news
On Tue, 04 May 2004 15:16:11 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


Maybe you need to elaborate on how nonexistent procedures can cause
something to happen.

snicker

I see as usual, you can't.

I will not answer a preposterous disingenuous question. Because you shriek
non existent procedures doesn't make it so. You haven't shown any validity
with this shriek though you have repeatedly parsed. The question is, will
you repeatedly demonstrate your feeble attempt in this matter.
snicker

You do understand now that you have been exposed as a net kook.

Here is what I stated: " True: FAA regulations do not specifically tell
NORAD to scramble AC. FAA Procedures explain what duties NORAD are during
the intercept".






You can try to dance your way out of what you said all day,
but you can't do it.

I don't need to dance. The facts are the facts and they certainly
aren't
what you are ultimately claiming.

Yes, Bryan, they are.

Absolutely and they once again show you to be a putz.

Which only demonstrates your stupidity, Bryan.

snicker

There is only one list you have provided (which I rebutted and you
ignored collectively) and as anyone can see there is more confusion on
your
end explaining FAA Procedural Misconceptions. In most instances you didn't
even mention the FAA misconceptions or explained what part of a procedure
is
causing the misconception as it specifically reads. snicker


http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&l...3Fhl%3Den%26lr
%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%3DLMlfc.49163%2524467.11470898%2540news
4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net%26rnum%3D1

snicker