A few snaps at KLIA [1/9] - DSC_6672.jpg (1/1)

On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:

Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take ca

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...ecurity-claims

--
Moving Things In Still Pictures

"Ri©ardo" wrote in message
...
On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:

Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take ca

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...ecurity-claims

--
Moving Things In Still Pictures

Thanks Ricardo.

Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no problems
while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries have a
different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak plane-spotter was
arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example. Many years ago I was in
Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport forbidding photography of
military aircraft. The only military aircraft in sight were a couple of
decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible significance could be attached
to them, but dutifully obeyed the injunction.

Cheers,

Indrek Aavisto




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

On 07/03/2015 15:31, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
On Sat, 07 Mar 2015 11:39:48 +0000, Ri©ardo wrote:

On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:

Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take ca

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...ecurity-claims

Wow, that is just nuts!


It pays to be cautious!

:-(

Ri©ardo

--
Moving Things In Still Pictures

On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:

"Ri©ardo" wrote in message
...
On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:

Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take ca

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...ecurity-claims


--
Moving Things In Still Pictures

Thanks Ricardo.

Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example. Many
years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military aircraft
in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
injunction.

Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
closely at AMS.


--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:

On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:

"Ri©ardo" wrote in message
...
On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:

Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take ca

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...ecurity-claims



--
Moving Things In Still Pictures

Thanks Ricardo.

Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example. Many
years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military aircraft
in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
injunction.

Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
closely at AMS.

Oops! Lets try that againn.



--
Rega
ds,

Savageduck

On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:

On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
"Ri©ardo" wrote in message
...
On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:

Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take ca

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...ecurity-claims


Thanks Ricardo.

Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example. Many
years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military aircraft
in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
injunction.

Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
closely at AMS.

Oops! Lets try that again.

I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
here is attempt #3.
If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
final try.




image


--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck said:

On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
"Ri©ardo" wrote in message
...
On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:

Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take ca

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...ecurity-claims

Thanks

Ricardo.

Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example. Many
years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military aircraft
in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
injunction.

Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
closely at AMS.

Oops! Lets try that again.

I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
here is attempt #3.
If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
final try.
Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
....and here is that final try:




image


--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 12/03/2015 06:10, Savageduck wrote:
On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck
said:

On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
"Ri©ardo" wrote in message
...
On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:

Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take ca

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...ecurity-claims


Thanks

Ricardo.

Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example.
Many
years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military
aircraft
in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
injunction.

Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
closely at AMS.

Oops! Lets try that again.

I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
here is attempt #3.
If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
final try.
Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
...and here is that final try:



image



That's a dramatic picture - great stuff. It was worth the wait.

;-)

Ri©ardo

--
Moving Things In Still Pictures

"Savageduck" wrote in message
news:2015031123103280979-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck
said:

On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
"Ri©ardo" wrote in message
...
On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:

Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take ca

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...ecurity-claims

Thanks

Ricardo.

Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example.
Many
years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military
aircraft
in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
injunction.

Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
closely at AMS.

Oops! Lets try that again.

I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
here is attempt #3.
If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
final try.
Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
...and here is that final try:







image


--
Regards,

Savageduck

That's certainly an atmospheric picture. Was it HDR from multiple exposures,
or from a single exposure?

Cheers,

Indrek Aavisto


--
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and
hence clamorous to be led to safety), by menacing it with an endless series
of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."

- H.L. Mencken



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com