![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, November 23, 2015 at 3:11:51 PM UTC-5, Larry Dighera wrote:
https://nexsuite.nexsure.com/Application/CustomerData.aspx Please fill out the form below in order to start your application process. All of your information is kept private and confidential. Program: Unmanned Aerial System Registration - Click "Email" To Save and Complete Later. Somehow I kinda doubt all the folks that get these drone toys from Sam's club, and Walmart are going to fill out the paperwork. --- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/FAA-Drone-Registry-Now-Open-225418-1.html FAA Drone Registry Now Open By Mary Grady Monday was the first day of the FAA’s drone registry, and it was not without glitches, with users reporting that it went down for a while shortly after it opened, and others complaining that the FAA posted incorrect information for law enforcement about deadlines. The site is back up and running, and that law-enforcement information has been fixed, but others are still finding problems in the system. One Twitter poster said he registered and then was shown information for someone from Nevada. “Did they even bug test this thing?” he asked. The FAA has, however, succeeded at getting the word out — virtually all of the major news outlets have covered the drone-registry story over the last week. Concerns also have been expressed that the registry information will be available on the web to anyone, and will include the names and addresses of minors as young as 13. The FAA told Forbes blogger John Goglia: “Until the drone registry system is modified, the FAA will not release names and address. When the drone registry system is modified to permit public searches of registration numbers, names and addresses will be revealed through those searches.” The Academy of Model Aeronautics has urged its 185,000 members to hold off on registering. “We strongly believe our members are not the problem and should not have to bear the burden of additional regulations,” the group says in its blog. The AMA has filed a petition in federal court challenging the FAA’s definition of model aircraft. The FAA has posted FAQs http://www.faa.gov/uas/faq/ and fact sheets online for anyone looking to use the new system. And in case you missed it, AVweb’s Paul Bertorelli issued his own assessment http://www.avweb.com/blogs/insider/Report-Card-on-FAAs-Drone-Registration-225371-1.html of the new drone-registration plan http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/FAA-Drone-Rule-Released-225367-1.html last week. On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:11:46 -0800, Larry Dighera wrote: https://nexsuite.nexsure.com/Application/CustomerData.aspx Please fill out the form below in order to start your application process. All of your information is kept private and confidential. Program: Unmanned Aerial System Registration - Click "Email" To Save and Complete Later. Account Manager UAV UAS E: Transport Risk Management, Inc 12424 Big Timber Drive Conifer, CO 80433 P: (720) 208-0844 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/Drone-Registration-Recommendations-Submitted-225254-1.html Drone Registration Recommendations Submitted By Russ Niles Drones weighing as little as eight ounces will have to be registered with the FAA if the agency accepts recommendations of a 26-member panel struck last month to design a registration scheme. The panel, which included representatives from Amazon, Google, drone manufacturers and aviation groups, delivered their recommendations http://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=19778 to the FAA Administrator Michael Huerta on Saturday. Although Huerta didn't release details of the suggestions, it's pretty hard to get 26 people to keep a secret so elements of the proposal started leaking out late last week. The panel wants registration to be free and to be painlessly accomplished online. Rather than register individual aircraft, the group wants operators themselves to be registered so that multiple drones can be listed under their names. It will be up to the FAA to determine the penalties that will apply to those who don't comply but analysts worry that because the vast majority of hobby users are unfamiliar with aviation regulations that compliance will be slow to start. Aviation groups were adamant that the drones fit into the existing system and that manned aviation not give up any airspace access to accommodate them. Huerta has promised a quick turnaround on the new rules because the FAA wants the rules in place before an estimated 700,000 drones end up as presents over the coming holidays. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.faa.gov/uas/legislative_programs/section_333/ Section 333 As of 11/20/2015 Number of Petitions Granted / Closed Petitions Granted: 2,384 Petitions Closed: 399 By law, any aircraft operation in the national airspace requires a certificated and registered aircraft, a licensed pilot, and operational approval http://www.faa.gov/uas/media/Sec_331_336_UAS.pdf. Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) (PDF) grants the Secretary of Transportation the authority to determine whether an airworthiness certificate is required for a UAS to operate safely in the National Airspace System (NAS). This authority is being leveraged to grant case-by-case authorization for certain unmanned aircraft to perform commercial operations prior to the finalization of the Small UAS Rule, which will be the primary method for authorizing small UAS operations once it is complete. The Section 333 Exemption process provides operators who wish to pursue safe and legal entry into the NAS a competitive advantage in the UAS marketplace, thus discouraging illegal operations and improving safety. It is anticipated that this activity will result in significant economic benefits, and the FAA Administrator has identified this as a high priority project to address demand for civil operation of UAS for commercial purposes. See current exemption requests http://www.regulations.gov/#!searchResults;rpp=25;po=0;s=%2522section%252B333 %2522%252BFAA;fp=true;ns=true See authorizations granted via Section 333 exemption http://www.faa.gov/uas/legislative_programs/section_333/333_authorizations/ See instructions for filing an exemption request http://www.faa.gov/uas/legislative_programs/section_333/how_to_file_a_petition/ Read the Section 333 FAQs http://www.faa.gov/uas/legislative_programs/section_333/333_faqs/ for answers to common questions. Questions about the Section 333 process should be directed to --------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2007-3330-0001 Instructions on Filing a Submission for FAA Section 333 Petitions This Other document was issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) For related information, Open Docket Folder Docket folder icon http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2007-3330 Content Overview : This Docket, FAA-2007-3330-0001, is referred to as the “FAA Section 333 Petitions Shell Docket”. If you are submitting a petition for an exemption to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Action of 2012 (Public Law 112-95), please make your submission to this Docket. If your petition is not related to Section 333 please go to docket number “FAA-2007-0001.” Process: Before submitting your petition, please review the FAA’s Website here. Once your petition has been submitted, it will be processed, assigned a permanent Docket Number, and posted to Regulations.gov. Due to the high volume of submissions, please allow up to 8 weeks for processing of your petition. Until it has been posted and assigned a Docket Number, you will receive a “Comment Tracking Number Match” message when searching your comment tracking number; rest assured, your submission has been received, and is in the queue to be posted. When your Docket Number has been assigned and your petition has been posted, the FAA will begin the petition review process. For most petitions, this review process takes less than 120 days; however, factors such as petition completeness, complexity, and volume of requests may affect the length of time needed to process your petition. The FAA will contact you if additional information is needed to process your petition. Otherwise, you may not hear from the FAA until a decision letter is issued. Further questions about the Section 333 exemption process should be directed to Questions about operating conditions and limitations with a Section 333 exemption should be directed to . Attachments (1) Instructions on Filing a Submission for FAA Section 333 Petitions View Attachment:View as format pdf http://www.regulations.gov/contentStreamer?documentId=FAA-2007-3330-0001&attachmentNumber=1&disposition=attachment&con tentType=pdf --------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.faa.gov/uas/contacts/ About Us The FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) is the Agency's single point of contact for everything UAS. It was established in 2013 with a vision for safe, timely, and efficient integration of UAS into the National Airspace System (NAS). The UAS Integration Office collaboratively develops operating concepts, policies, requirements, criteria, and procedures for new system evaluations, integration, and implementation of emerging UAS technologies. It is the sponsoring office for all FAA UAS Research and Development initiatives, and coordinates all UAS operational authorizations, including Certificate of Waiver or Authorizations (COAs) and Section 333 exemptions. Contact Us If you believe an imminent risk exists to public safety or to the national airspace, please call your local law enforcement official. If you witness or have information about a safety-related UAS event, please contact the Agency's Aviation Safety Hotline website http://www.faa.gov/contact/safety_hotline/ or call 1-866-835-5322, Option 4. If you have a general question, comment, or complaint about UAS, please contact us via email at . --------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsid=84245 FAA: Think Twice about "Drone Registration" Firms November 16 – Unmanned aircraft users should know they probably won’t need help registering their drones when the system is in place. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) wants unmanned aircraft owners to know that there's no need to work with a “drone registration” company to help them file an application for a registration number. Owners should wait until additional details about the forthcoming drone registration system are announced later this month before paying anyone to do the work for them. The Task Force assigned to provide FAA Administrator Michael Huerta with recommendations on the registration process is still days away from delivering this information. But at least one company is already offering to help people register their drones for a fee. Speaking to the Task Force two weeks ago, Administrator Huerta told the group to provide guidance on a streamlined unmanned aircraft registration process that will be simple and easy to complete, and which types of UAS would need to be registered and which would not. The Task Force agreed and is working on recommendations for a system that is similar to registering any newly purchased product with its manufacturer as well as a minimum weight for unmanned aircraft that must be registered. Drone owners should visit FAA.gov for official updates on the unmanned aircraft registry. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- https://twitter.com/faanews/status/668848780456755202 UAS Registration Task Force Recommendations Final Report now available http://1.usa.gov/1LvYd9W https://t.co/rDFJb6wka3 #drones https://twitter.com/hashtag/drones?src=hash |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/24/2015 5:49 AM, Larry Dighera wrote:
Did you see that skier nearly get taken out by the crashing drone? Why don't they have the same regs as we have when flying display in that we do not fly or maneuver over the audience? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 07:17:00 +1200, george152 wrote:
On 12/24/2015 5:49 AM, Larry Dighera wrote: Did you see that skier nearly get taken out by the crashing drone? Why don't they have the same regs as we have when flying display in that we do not fly or maneuver over the audience? http://www.greenfieldreporter.com/view/story/9680a8b4a3934750a8eeacd6594996cb/SKI--Drone-Crash Ski federation bans drones after camera nearly hits racer From Sports, VIENNA (AP) — The international ski federation is banning camera drones from its World Cup races after a drone crashed and nearly hit Austrian… Read it on Flipboard ----------------------------- Camera drones banned from ski races after object falls from sky and nearly hits racer By ERIC WILLEMSEN Associated Press First Posted: December 23, 2015 - 3:26 pm Last Updated: December 23, 2015 - 3:26 pm Photos: In this image taken from video a camera drone crashes into the snow narrowly missing Austria's Marcel Hirscher during an alpine ski, men's World Cup slalom, in Madonna Di Campiglio, Italy, Tuesday, Dec. 22, 2015. (Infront Sport via AP) MANDATORY CREDIT NO SALES NO ARCHIVE ONE TIME USE ONLY VIENNA — The international ski federation is banning camera drones from its World Cup races after one of the flying objects crashed and nearly hit Austrian skier Marcel Hirscher during a slalom in Italy. FIS will prohibit drones "as long as I am responsible ... because they are a bad thing for safety," men's race director Markus Waldner told The Associated Press on Wednesday, a day after the night race in Madonna di Campiglio. "It was huge luck that Marcel was not hurt," Waldner said. "I am very angry." The drone carrying a TV camera came down and shattered on the icy slope just behind Hirscher, a few seconds after the Olympic silver medalist started his second run. The company responsible for the drone, sports marketing agency Infront, said its initial investigation "indicates a malfunction of the drone." "The most likely reason is a strong and unforeseen interference on the operating frequency, leading to limited operability," Infront said in a statement. "The pilot followed the official security procedure, purposely flying the drone as close as possible to the ground before releasing it. The aim was to destroy the drone, in order to prevent it from losing control." Hirscher was unhurt and continued his run, finishing second behind Norwegian winner Henrik Kristoffersen. "I didn't know what it was, but I felt something," the four-time overall World Cup champion said. "I thought it was a course worker behind me, or a gate." Course workers slip through the gates shortly after each skier to smooth the snow surface for the next competitor. "I am very relieved that nothing happened," Hirscher said. "You don't want to think about what could have happened when 10 kilograms (22 pounds) are coming down 20 meters (65 feet). That would have been a very serious, bad injury. There are a lot of cool things nowadays. But you have to guarantee the safety — and that was just insane." Infront said the drone and its pilot were provided by a third party, adding that an external independent expert will formally investigate the matter. "We are extremely relieved that apparently none was hurt," said Infront, a Switzerland-based agency that has been the long-term TV rights holder of the FIS Alpine skiing World Cup. According to Waldner, FIS had agreed on the use of the drone at Tuesday's slalom but the pilot wasn't allowed to fly the camera directly over the race course. "He did not follow our instructions," the race director said. "He had to fly outside of the race track and follow the racer from a 15-meter (50-foot) distance. Then there would have been a margin and nothing could have happened." Drones have been used many times before at ski races. The ski federation said the technology was aimed at enhancing the experience for TV viewers as it provides moving pictures from an overhead angle which regular cameras can't shoot. FIS said legal restrictions in Italy for the use of drones at events are not as tight as in many other countries, such as Austria and Switzerland, where flying over a crowd has been banned. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Eagle vs. drone | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | November 16th 15 02:52 PM |
Over NYC 3 - drone.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman[_8_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 7th 15 01:33 PM |
USA Region 9 South, SSA on-line registration open | TS1 | Soaring | 0 | November 23rd 09 11:38 PM |
Getting students to line up with the center line | BoDEAN | Piloting | 27 | April 21st 04 11:23 AM |
On-Line Contest Registration | JJ Sinclair | Soaring | 13 | March 5th 04 03:01 PM |