![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can someone comment on the best aircraft for this job? My gut suggests that among the
planes a nation might be able to buy the best might be something like a Mig-21 or Q-5 Fantan with western radar or an F-5 (if they are available). --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WHAT IS A SOVERIGNTY PROTECTION FIGHTER? It's a fighter that is available to political leaders to contest challenges to the nations borders. They are not expected to engage in combat in the normal course of operations. WHAT ARE EXAMPLES? During the cold war when Russian Bears would come close to Alaska, we would send up fighters not to shoot them down, but just to remind them that we protect Alaskan airspace. Sometimes the pricipal purpose of the fighter is sovergnity protection. No one expectsBrazil, Switzerland, or New Zealand's fighters to engage in air-air combat. Instead we expect them to be available to political leaders and to enforce border security and sometimes anti-drug operations. WHAT ARE THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS They should be able to catch opposing aircraft, typically at high-subsonic speed and high altitude. At minimum there are lots of business aircraft that can do Mach 0.9 at 50,000 feet. They should be able to find the target aircraft. A radar with moderate range is needed. Typically this radar will not face enemy jamming. They should have reasonable endurance. Escorting an target aircraft might require a half-hour or more beyond the flight to and from the intercept point. They should have a weapons system. Short range weapons systems are fine. Guns are fine. And ABOVE ALL ELSE, they should be low in total systems cost. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Charles Talleyrand wrote: No one expects [...] or New Zealand's fighters to engage in air-air combat. Especially since they don't have any. -- Urban Fredriksson Military aviation; Swedish military aviation http://www.canit.se/%7Egriffon/aviation/ Weblog http://www.canit.se/%7Egriffon/aviation/avblog.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message ... Can someone comment on the best aircraft for this job? My gut suggests that among the planes a nation might be able to buy the best might be something like a Mig-21 or Q-5 Fantan with western radar or an F-5 (if they are available). Neither seem a good choice being short on range , lacking room for a good radar and having high operational costs. These are after all 1960's era aircraft The Saab Grippen or Mig-29 would seem a better choice. Keith |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message ...
Can someone comment on the best aircraft for this job? My gut suggests that among the planes a nation might be able to buy the best might be something like a Mig-21 or Q-5 Fantan with western radar or an F-5 (if they are available). Sometimes the pricipal purpose of the fighter is sovergnity protection. No one expectsBrazil, Switzerland, or New Zealand's fighters to engage in air-air combat. Instead we expect them to be available to political leaders and to enforce border security and sometimes anti-drug operations. No one expectsBrazil, Switzerland, or New Zealand's fighters to engage in air-air combat. Why not? The Royal New Zealand Air Force has retired all its A-4s and MB339s without replacement. They have no fighter capability. Brazil has postponed its new fighter choice but listed the F-16, Gripen, Mirage 2000, Su-35 and MiG-29 as candidates. Due to cost it is likely that they will either lease or buy used aircraft. The Swiss train regularly in air combat. Due to restricted airspace they use the North Sea trainiing ranges supported by British Aerospace at RAF Waddington, Lincolnshire in England. The Swiss use F/A-18s and F-5s. http://www.airsceneuk.org.uk/hangar/1999/swiss/acmi.htm Picture of Swiss Hornet fitted out with range instrumentation pod: http://www.warplane.co.uk/Nomad/n36.jpg |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can someone comment on the best aircraft for this job?
Possibly the upcoming military version of the Javelin being developed by ATG. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "robert arndt" wrote in message om... (DJFawcett26) wrote in message ... Can someone comment on the best aircraft for this job? Possibly the upcoming military version of the Javelin being developed by ATG. ATG Javelin photo: http://www.twocommas.ca/collections/...front-left.jpg Personally, I'd just wait for the EADS Mako... Rob Has the Mako flown yet? Just remembering the hoohaa raised in the UK when the AJT was being decided. Obviously the Hawk 128 won, but a lot of people wanted the Mako above the italian option.. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message ...
Can someone comment on the best aircraft for this job? My gut suggests that among the planes a nation might be able to buy the best might be something like a Mig-21 or Q-5 Fantan with western radar or an F-5 (if they are available). --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WHAT IS A SOVERIGNTY PROTECTION FIGHTER? It's sole purpose would seem to be the interception and shooting down of airliners that have been hijacked and are about to dive into the whitehouse. Clearly there is a need thousands of these fighters to carry out millions of interceptions. They will need to be shipped in pork barells 6 at a time to have maximim effect. Alternatively a Sopwith camel could be used to patrol the Rio Grande. Opperation wet back II anyone? "Soverignty Protection Fighter" is worth less than one world war I string bag if the "administration" is the real threat to Soveringty and isn't interested in stopping illegal immigration or denying those illegal all manner of benefits from education, medical care and subsidised housing or deportation. It's a fighter that is available to political leaders to contest challenges to the nations borders. They are not expected to engage in combat in the normal course of operations. WHAT ARE EXAMPLES? During the cold war when Russian Bears would come close to Alaska, we would send up fighters not to shoot them down, but just to remind them that we protect Alaskan airspace. The Bear rear gunner used to laugh at Torando pilots: with its drop tanks on the Tornado a Bear could out accelerate a Tornado and roll away while the Tornado pilot had to light up his afterburners to keep up. A "SPF" would be a similar laughing stock if confronted with a Backfire or Blackjack. Sometimes the pricipal purpose of the fighter is sovergnity protection. No one expectsBrazil, Switzerland, or New Zealand's fighters to engage in air-air combat. Instead we expect them to be available to political leaders and to enforce border security and sometimes anti-drug operations. WHAT ARE THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS They should be able to catch opposing aircraft, typically at high-subsonic speed and high altitude. At minimum there are lots of business aircraft that can do Mach 0.9 at 50,000 feet. They should be able to find the target aircraft. A radar with moderate range is needed. Typically this radar will not face enemy jamming. They should have reasonable endurance. Escorting an target aircraft might require a half-hour or more beyond the flight to and from the intercept point. They should have a weapons system. Short range weapons systems are fine. Guns are fine. And ABOVE ALL ELSE, they should be low in total systems cost. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ian" wrote in message ...
"robert arndt" wrote in message om... (DJFawcett26) wrote in message ... Can someone comment on the best aircraft for this job? Possibly the upcoming military version of the Javelin being developed by ATG. ATG Javelin photo: http://www.twocommas.ca/collections/...front-left.jpg Personally, I'd just wait for the EADS Mako... Rob Has the Mako flown yet? Just remembering the hoohaa raised in the UK when the AJT was being decided. Obviously the Hawk 128 won, but a lot of people wanted the Mako above the italian option.. Not yet, but coming up in a year or two. A photo: http://www.airforce-technology.com/p...ads_mako_6.jpg Rob |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Personally, I'd just wait for the EADS Mako...
You will be waiting a long time, the program is dead |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 111 | May 4th 04 05:34 PM |
No More New Fighter Aircraft Types? | W. D. Allen Sr. | Military Aviation | 120 | April 18th 04 07:08 AM |
A-4 / A-7 Question | Tank Fixer | Military Aviation | 135 | October 25th 03 03:59 AM |
Joint Russian-French 5th generation fighter? | lihakirves | Military Aviation | 1 | July 5th 03 01:36 AM |