![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Wise" wrote in message ... In article , "Kevin Brooks" wrote: I wonder hiw many G's Bush had to withstand on that helo flight? The S-3 is a "helo" in Artian World? Amazing feat of transformation you have going for you there--taking a twin engined carrier based ASW jet and turning it into a "helo"... Those of us who manned twin engines carrier based ASW helos might object to this seeming slight to the Navy helo community...not that we didn't frequently see it amongst are own kind in the CAG/CVW. No "seeming slight" was implied; just an observation that Art is (once again) out-of-touch with reality when he claims Bush flew in on a helo and did not require a flight suit, survival vest, etc. I can assure you that a flight suit and SV-2 (survival vest) were required wearing (over land or water) on most of 2000+ hours I flew on Navy CV-based helos. No doubt, as the Army even requires similar attire. But did you wear Art's "G-suit"? The only people who wore G-suits in the Navy CVW were those who flew jets (even Hoover guys, I believe), so no. Navy helo attire consists of a flight suit, boots, helmut, gloves (rarely worn) and SV-2 (with HEEDS bottle). On over-water missions or exercises, the rescue swimmer (almost always the junior crewman) wears a rescue sling and BC in place of the flight suit and SV-2. Wow! Can you gander at the referenced photo and point to the "G suit" that the President is supposedly wearing? I see a normal flight suit with vest/etc., but no "G suit"; oddly enough, his pilot does not appear to be wearing one either... www.poptransit.com/ review2003/top.html Personally, I have no gripes with the specific attire he wore as with his advisors' decision to put him in a uniform he's barely sit to look at. "barely sit to look at"??? OK....right.... So from the context of my sentence you're not capable of spotting the obvious typo as well as discerning what the word should have been? No, not when you started it with, "I have no gripes with the specific attire he wore as..." As what? "As it was required"? The "his advisors decision" does not fit well into that introductory clause you created, and the "sit" just further muddles whatever meaning you have tried to convey. If I need to spell it out: Bush Jr. is scarcely fit to even look at a Navy uniform; much less look at one. Ah-hah! Well, given that you have again proven incapable of even recognizing the details of the uniform you have chosen to argue about (where is that G suit again?), your conclsion above has to be taken in perspective--and your perspective view appears to be a bit myopic. The fact is that Bush is one of only two Presidents who does indeed have *any* claim on the right to don a flightsuit, as he is one of only two who ever piloted military aircraft. Now, I recommend you go back and brush up on "uniform details" and get that whole G-suit recognition problem in hand... Brooks --Mike --Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Wise" wrote in message ... In article , "Kevin Brooks" wrote: No doubt, as the Army even requires similar attire. But did you wear Art's "G-suit"? The only people who wore G-suits in the Navy CVW were those who flew jets (even Hoover guys, I believe), so no. Navy helo attire consists of a flight suit, boots, helmut, gloves (rarely worn) and SV-2 (with HEEDS bottle). On over-water missions or exercises, the rescue swimmer (almost always the junior crewman) wears a rescue sling and BC in place of the flight suit and SV-2. Wow! Can you gander at the referenced photo and point to the "G suit" that the President is supposedly wearing? No, but then again, I never said stated that Mr. Bush was (or wasn't) wearing a G-suit...now did I? "The only people who wore G-suits in the Navy CVW were those who flew jets (even Hoover guys, I believe)..." Those were your words, right? And FYI, what you were weighing in on was Art's less-than-accurate description of Bush wearing a "G suit" for a "helo" ride. I see a normal flight suit with vest/etc., but no "G suit"; oddly enough, his pilot does not appear to be wearing one either... www.poptransit.com/ review2003/top.html Great, and this is relevant to what I said in what way? See above, and go back and actually READ what you were responding to. Bush Jr. is scarcely fit to even look at a Navy uniform; much less look at one. Ah-hah! Well, given that you have again proven incapable of even recognizing the details of the uniform you have chosen to argue about (where is that G suit again?), your conclsion above has to be taken in perspective--and your perspective view appears to be a bit myopic. Ah-hah! Well, given that you have again proven incapable of even recognizing the details of a message thread (as in who said what) you have chosen to argue about (where did I state Mr. Bush wore a G suit again?) See above. Now, I recommend you go back and brush up on "uniform details" and get that whole G-suit recognition problem in hand... While I'm doing that, I recommend you go back and brush up on "reading comprehension details" as well as Usenet threading concepts...paying particular attention to who is saying what. Then maybe you can get your attribution problem in hand. Eh? I do believe it was my comment about Art's characterization of Bush wearing a "G suit" that was what you opined about, and added that bit about S-3 crew wearing them, too.... Brooks --Mike |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() From: Ed Rasimus Date: 9/10/2004 11:02 AM Pac ittle Bushie always wanted to be a fighter pilot like daddy - only he failed Daddy flew an SBD. Hardly a fighter. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art wrote:
Daddy flew an SBD. Hardly a fighter. Elder Bush flew a TBM or TBF. You screwed up again Art. But then it was not B-26s in ETO, so it really didn't happen. Rick |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... From: Ed Rasimus Date: 9/10/2004 11:02 AM Pac ittle Bushie always wanted to be a fighter pilot like daddy - only he failed Daddy flew an SBD. Hardly a fighter. You are wrong (he flew the TBM Avenger)--again. Or are you lying? How do we tell the difference anymore? Brooks Arthur Kramer |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:42:28 -0400, "Kevin Brooks"
wrote: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... From: Ed Rasimus Date: 9/10/2004 11:02 AM Pac ittle Bushie always wanted to be a fighter pilot like daddy - only he failed Daddy flew an SBD. Hardly a fighter. You are wrong (he flew the TBM Avenger)--again. Or are you lying? How do we tell the difference anymore? Brooks Arthur Kramer For the record, despite snipping leaving a credit line above, I said none of the things in this post. I don't refer to the President as "Bushie" and I don't refer to his father as "Daddy". And, while I may be opinionated, I don't think I've been accused of lying recently even when folks disagree with me. Let's snip with a bit more care. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" "Phantom Flights, Bangkok Nights" Both from Smithsonian Books ***www.thunderchief.org |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed,
I can only see part of this thread - but I never associated the clip Art included in his post as being something you would post - I'm sure very few regular readers of this NG would have believed it came from you. I will believe it was an accident - but somewhat skeptically. Jack G. "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message ... On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:42:28 -0400, "Kevin Brooks" wrote: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... From: Ed Rasimus Date: 9/10/2004 11:02 AM Pac ittle Bushie always wanted to be a fighter pilot like daddy - only he failed Daddy flew an SBD. Hardly a fighter. You are wrong (he flew the TBM Avenger)--again. Or are you lying? How do we tell the difference anymore? Brooks Arthur Kramer For the record, despite snipping leaving a credit line above, I said none of the things in this post. I don't refer to the President as "Bushie" and I don't refer to his father as "Daddy". And, while I may be opinionated, I don't think I've been accused of lying recently even when folks disagree with me. Let's snip with a bit more care. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" "Phantom Flights, Bangkok Nights" Both from Smithsonian Books ***www.thunderchief.org |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ibm wrote:
Mary Shafer wrote: [snip] I thought the senior Bush flew an airplane that dropped anti-shipping torpedoes? That would make him an attack pilot by today's terms, I'd think, not a fighter pilot. Yes, the TB[F/M] was roled as a Torpedo Bomber but was capable of moving dirt as well. Think heavy attack. The TB part of the designator implies torpedo bomber. An SBD or Helldiver driver would be more analogous to today's VA crowd although you could do considerable damage from a Corsair as well. IBM The Avenger, as a bomber, had a rather larger bombload than the SBD. Probably around the same as the Helldiver. Was it not on a dirt-moving mission over Chichi Jima that GHWB was shot down and subsequently rescured by bubbleheads? -- Marc Reeve Some guy at a desk somewhere ^reverse^ for email |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Daddy flew an SBD. Hardly a fighter. Daddy flew a TBM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message ... On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:42:28 -0400, "Kevin Brooks" wrote: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... From: Ed Rasimus Date: 9/10/2004 11:02 AM Pac ittle Bushie always wanted to be a fighter pilot like daddy - only he failed Daddy flew an SBD. Hardly a fighter. You are wrong (he flew the TBM Avenger)--again. Or are you lying? How do we tell the difference anymore? Brooks Arthur Kramer For the record, despite snipping leaving a credit line above, I said none of the things in this post. I don't refer to the President as "Bushie" and I don't refer to his father as "Daddy". And, while I may be opinionated, I don't think I've been accused of lying recently even when folks disagree with me. Firstly, I did not snip anything--period. You have a beef about the earlier snips, take them to the source of the problem, which ain't me in this case. Secondly, the liar bit is directed solely at Art, and I think you already figured that out. Brooks Let's snip with a bit more care. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" "Phantom Flights, Bangkok Nights" Both from Smithsonian Books ***www.thunderchief.org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Baltimore Sun investigation: Abuse goes far beyond the military police | GrPrtrd8 | Military Aviation | 0 | May 11th 04 06:05 AM |
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) | Anonymous Spamless | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 05:09 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
Updated List of Military Information-Exchange Forums | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 29th 03 02:20 AM |
List of News, Discussion and Info Exchange forums | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 14th 03 05:01 AM |