![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe...ash/index.html
Within 4 minutes of each other. Both took off from Domodedovo Coincidence, or...? Pete ----------------------------------------------- (CNN) -- Two passenger planes have crashed in Russia Tuesday night, Russian officials and a news organization said. A passenger jet carrying 34 passengers and eight crew members in the Tula region crashed about 160 kilometers (100 miles) south of Moscow, the ministry reported. A second plane went down about 160 kilometers (100 miles) from Rostov-on-Don, in southern Russia, government-run news agency Ria Novosti reported. A ministry spokeswoman said she could only confirm that the second plane had been lost to radar. The first plane disappeared from radar at 10:56 p.m. (2:56 p.m. ET), a ministry spokeswoman said. The Tupolev-134 had taken off from Moscow's Domodedovo Airport and was en route to Volgograd, in southern Russia. The second plane, a Tupolev-154, disappeared at 11 p.m. (3 p.m. ET) after having taken off from the same airport en route to Sochi in southern Russia, Ria Novosti reported. There was no immediate word how many people were aboard the second plane. The Tupolev-154 is a standard medium-range airliner on domestic flights in Russia, according to aviation websites. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pete" wrote in message ... http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe...ash/index.html Within 4 minutes of each other. Both took off from Domodedovo Right now they are saying that Russian sources report eyewitnesses seeing the 134 explode in mid-air before coming down. Coincidence, or...? If the reports of a mid-air explosion for the 134 are correct, then I'd imagine that losing two aircraft at about the same time, from the same departure point, puts things a bit outside the likely coincidence realm. Brooks snip |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kevin Brooks wrote:
"Pete" wrote in message ... http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe...ash/index.html Within 4 minutes of each other. Both took off from Domodedovo Right now they are saying that Russian sources report eyewitnesses seeing the 134 explode in mid-air before coming down. Coincidence, or...? If the reports of a mid-air explosion for the 134 are correct, then I'd imagine that losing two aircraft at about the same time, from the same departure point, puts things a bit outside the likely coincidence realm. Agreed, although that's a might big if. The number of a/c which are reported by eyewitnesses to have exploded/been on fire before crashing but which were subsequently found not to have been, is rather large. Another possibility, assuming no explosion, would be a fuel contamination problem at Domededovo. If the Tu-154 which disappeared had tanks that were more full than the other before being topped up, that might explain the longer delay before problems surfaced, depending on the order in which fuel is drawn. OTOH, the lack of any radio comms from either a/c would be considered highly suspicious with western a/c -- considering the reported state of Russian civil aviation and ATC I don't know that we can jump to the same conclusion in this case. Guy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guy Alcala wrote:
Kevin Brooks wrote: "Pete" wrote in message . .. http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe...ash/index.html Within 4 minutes of each other. Both took off from Domodedovo Right now they are saying that Russian sources report eyewitnesses seeing the 134 explode in mid-air before coming down. Coincidence, or...? If the reports of a mid-air explosion for the 134 are correct, then I'd imagine that losing two aircraft at about the same time, from the same departure point, puts things a bit outside the likely coincidence realm. Agreed, although that's a might big if. The number of a/c which are reported by eyewitnesses to have exploded/been on fire before crashing but which were subsequently found not to have been, is rather large. Another possibility, assuming no explosion, would be a fuel contamination problem at Domededovo. If the Tu-154 which disappeared had tanks that were more full than the other before being topped up, that might explain the longer delay before problems surfaced, depending on the order in which fuel is drawn. OTOH, the lack of any radio comms from either a/c would be considered highly suspicious with western a/c -- considering the reported state of Russian civil aviation and ATC I don't know that we can jump to the same conclusion in this case. Guy I would be surprised if it was fuel contamination - Domodedovo is now Moscow's premier airport and Eastline, the owners, have spent millions updating it. I was there last Monday - see :- http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/...004_day03.html for a ramp tour and the facilities would put many western airports to shame. It is as modern as they come. That is not to say that fuel contamination is impossible - just unlikely IMHO. I was also surprised when I heard that the two a/c had departed from Domodedovo - the security we experienced was very tight - and we were an authorised party with prior permissions, passes etc. I could have understood it if the flights had begun at Vnukovo, Bykovo or even Sheremetyevo - but Domodedovo ? Ken |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They start from the same point, in Russian media poor fuel is one discussed
thing. "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message ... "Pete" wrote in message ... http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe...ash/index.html Within 4 minutes of each other. Both took off from Domodedovo Right now they are saying that Russian sources report eyewitnesses seeing the 134 explode in mid-air before coming down. Coincidence, or...? If the reports of a mid-air explosion for the 134 are correct, then I'd imagine that losing two aircraft at about the same time, from the same departure point, puts things a bit outside the likely coincidence realm. Brooks snip |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vello wrote:
They start from the same point, in Russian media poor fuel is one discussed thing. The obvious problem with that idea is that poor fuel would usually just stop the engines, leaving them 30,000 feet or so of gliding descent in which to report their difficulties and attempt power-off landings. It seems rather likely that some form of malice was at work and that the technical investigations will merely discover whether hijacking or bombs or some other form of sabotage was used. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Briggs" wrote in message ... Vello wrote: They start from the same point, in Russian media poor fuel is one discussed thing. The obvious problem with that idea is that poor fuel would usually just stop the engines, leaving them 30,000 feet or so of gliding descent in which to report their difficulties and attempt power-off landings. Gas turbines are pretty tolerant of fuel quality and if this was the problem I'd expect a lot more than 2 aircraft to be affected. Keith |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My local paper this morning said the southernmost plane sent a hijack code
just before it went off radar. -- B-58 Hustler History: http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/ - "Pete" wrote in message ... http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe...ash/index.html Within 4 minutes of each other. Both took off from Domodedovo Coincidence, or...? Pete ----------------------------------------------- (CNN) -- Two passenger planes have crashed in Russia Tuesday night, Russian officials and a news organization said. A passenger jet carrying 34 passengers and eight crew members in the Tula region crashed about 160 kilometers (100 miles) south of Moscow, the ministry reported. A second plane went down about 160 kilometers (100 miles) from Rostov-on-Don, in southern Russia, government-run news agency Ria Novosti reported. A ministry spokeswoman said she could only confirm that the second plane had been lost to radar. The first plane disappeared from radar at 10:56 p.m. (2:56 p.m. ET), a ministry spokeswoman said. The Tupolev-134 had taken off from Moscow's Domodedovo Airport and was en route to Volgograd, in southern Russia. The second plane, a Tupolev-154, disappeared at 11 p.m. (3 p.m. ET) after having taken off from the same airport en route to Sochi in southern Russia, Ria Novosti reported. There was no immediate word how many people were aboard the second plane. The Tupolev-154 is a standard medium-range airliner on domestic flights in Russia, according to aviation websites. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article VP6Xc.135504$sh.122307@fed1read06, Darrell
wrote: My local paper this morning said the southernmost plane sent a hijack code just before it went off radar. A report that has not been discounted by Russian authorities. -john- -- ================================================== ================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ================== |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Did we win in Viet Nam? | Lisakbernacchia | Military Aviation | 89 | July 12th 04 06:03 AM |
SpaceShip 1 - South African Connection | MWEB | Home Built | 4 | July 1st 04 07:08 AM |
CIA U2 over flight of Moscow | John Bailey | Military Aviation | 3 | April 9th 04 03:58 AM |
U.S. Troops, Aircraft a Hit at Moscow Air Show | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 28th 03 10:04 PM |
U.S. Air Force lands at Moscow air show | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 20th 03 04:19 AM |