![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Emmanuel Gustin" wrote in message ...
"Top Secret" wrote in message ... Compared to Allied forces, what was the max they fielded? My understanding is they lacked heavy bombers. Probably the SC 1800; SC for "Spreng Cylindrisch" (cylindrical HE) and 1800 for the weight in kilogram. The SC 1800 was a big bomb, but with modifications a Fw 190 could carry one, and a He 111 could carry two on external bomb racks. No, SC 2500: http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/7087/uk019b.jpg Note: This is the bomb casing that the two German spherical radiological weapons under construction were to be carried in and dropped by either a) the re-activated Sanger antipodal bomber project of Feb 1945 (mock-up construction discovered in Lofer factory at end of war) or b) Horten XVIII "Amerika" bomber project of March 1945 (with partial tubular steel center section started before collapse) with the intention of dropping them on NYC. Rob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Iran's nuclear program | Thelasian | Military Aviation | 107 | August 31st 04 06:35 AM |
FDR and Bush 43 | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 44 | June 24th 04 12:16 AM |
A BOMB PATTER IS LIKE A FOOTBALL | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 17 | March 3rd 04 01:54 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
AIRCRAFT MUNITIONS - THE COBALT BOMB | Garrison Hilliard | Military Aviation | 1 | August 29th 03 09:22 AM |