![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Kambic" wrote in message ... "Giz" wrote in message snipped for brevity Hey Bill, are you an A-dub? Ayup!g I'm one of the active duty types that has seen behind the curtain. I left active duty after my first 4 and joined the reserves (SAU VP0545), but came back to active duty after 4.5 there. I don't view the reserves as wasteful, but I do view them as somewhat of a luxury. We shouldn't have reserve squadrons instead of active squadrons. Well, maybe so and maybe not. A lot depends on your definition of "luxury" and and missions that need to be accomplished. Substantial numbers of birds will be parked this summer. By luxury I mean we are facing a this or that choice. The day when we could have both has passed us by. To keep all the Reserve Squadrons would cost us Active Squadrons. While I believe in the value of the Reserves, I don't think that would be a wise choice. Bottom line, we can't have both. One of the hardest lessons of WWII was that the virtual elimination of ASW assets in the RN and USN after WWI damn near caused a catastrophe. If the Japanese had followed German practice with their subs it probably would have. Again, the WWII analogy is not directly on point as no potential adversary CURRENTLY possesses a significant subsurface threat. There are lots of subs out there in the hands of possible "bad guys" but so far they have not choosen to use them. If they do then long range maritime patrol may not be of too much help and the S3 series might be sorely missed. A choice that the VP community would be facing in the near future if we didn't make use of the aircraft in the reserve units. I do believe that the SAU concept will be making a return to the Naval Air Reserve, and hopefully we can reform some of the units when MMA is online. I doubt that budget pressures in the future will be less than they are now. The idea that we will buy enough MMA airframes to outfit non-existant RESFORON/SAUs smacks of a GREAT DEAL of optomism!g I doubt that too, but a shuffle of P-3 airframes that are left may reconstitute several Reserve Squadrons. And that still does not address the other hardware units. If the air assets go how long before the FFGs follow? It seems to me that if the Reserve Forces are to survive being anything but "knife and fork" units spending their time watching "Victory at Sea" reruns then they had better look to their "hole card" and crack up some Congressional support for at least maintenace of the status quo. Hopefully, the SAU concept will keep that from happening. Bill Kambic Giz AW1(NAC/AW) CPW-11, CV-59, VP-0545, CV-66, VP-45, VP-30 WTU |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trident I C-4 is damaged at US naval base | Krztalizer | Military Aviation | 20 | April 7th 04 03:05 AM |
John Kerry insults military reserves | T. Nguyen | Military Aviation | 15 | February 23rd 04 01:22 AM |
This week in naval, aviation history, By Bill Swanson | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 17th 03 09:37 PM |
FS: Naval and Aviation Books | Gernot Hassenpflug | Military Aviation | 0 | August 9th 03 05:06 AM |
FA: Naval Ships & Aircraft - 1950 | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 8th 03 11:53 PM |