![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm curious about the US doctrine for anti-shipping attacks 25 years ago -
say, the late 70's/early 80's? What were the weapons to be employed to lower the target below sea level? (I'm not so much interested in the use of ARMs, but rather the larger-explosives designed to let water in or start toasty fires.) For example: In the Falklands, the Argies used gravity bombs, delivered from low-level in daylight. Would the USN have employed the same weapons and in the same way? [Yes, there were a couple of Exocets too.] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Figter Tactics Academy is back in business | Jarmo Lindberg | Military Aviation | 3 | July 6th 04 10:18 AM |
Mosquito fighter-bomber tactics question | Kari Korpi | Military Aviation | 6 | April 5th 04 09:09 AM |
Were the Tuskeegee Airmen Wrong? | Stephen Harding | Military Aviation | 63 | February 14th 04 07:38 PM |