If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"Arved Sandstrom" wrote in message
... "Steven James Forsberg" wrote in message ... [ SNIP ] In the officer ranks there was a virtual civil war over the issue of "technical knowledge." In our project, officers were *administrators* and not really managers nor leaders. They made no significant operational decisions, and were often so 'technically' inept they made the CPOs look like true gurus. For better or for worse, they were supposed to handle security paperwork and the office budget, make sure people sometimes wore uniforms to work, etc. and that's about it. Indeed, when a trained or experienced officer happened to land in a DivO billet, for example, they'd often pretend they were ignorant to avoid the cutting criticism "technician". We once had an Ensign, brand new E-Engineer who just happened to have helped design one of our systems while in college, step in and help the tech reps when a newly installed component failed hard and bought operations to a screeching halt. The tech reps were impressed, in theory Washington was pleased the problem got fixed. The ensign was verbally admonished for "forgetting his role" and taking part in a 'technical' matter. Silly us, we thought the whole purpose behind his education was to allow him to make key saves like that. I don't doubt what you say, at least in the specific field you cite. I'm sure you could winkle out some occupational specialties or units in the Marine Corps where the attitudes approach the above, but there wouldn't be many. In combat arms, probably the only "administrative" enlisted slots are the admin track at E-8 and E-9; i.e. 1st Sgt and Sgt Maj. And even they are actually using a great deal of leadership, even if it is primarily related to paperwork, welfare of the people, disciplinary matters, and advising the CO. Sometimes the latter two positions would be filled by people who didn't have formal schooling or much experience in that combat arm, but they were e xpected to self-educate to a certain proficiency level, or perhaps a familiarity level is more accurate. Certainly all of the other enlisted ranks, include the technical track at E-8 and E-9 (Master Sgt and Master Gunnery Sgt), were very definitely leaders but also expected to be technically proficient. As far as officers go (in the Corps), they just skip around in various jobs more. But at least in combat arms, they are most definitely leaders too. Again, I'm sure you could locate MOS's, units or specific billets where that isn't so, but I don't think you'd find a circumstance of either officers or senior enlisted being discouraged from technical details. I could be mistaken, but I think the USMC is the least officer top-heavy of any of the armed services. An obvious result of that is that enlisted and officers both have more shared responsibilities, both technically and in terms of leadership. I've seem majors in charge of only twenty-odd Marines (an officer of that rank is common for an artillery regimental liaison section), and warrant officers or staff sergeants in charge of three times that many, and second lieutenants in charge of perhaps 2 or 3. In GW1, I was a corporal and in charge of 12 people, and equally, you wouldn't think twice about having a PFC or Lance Cpl take charge of a platoon - you'd expect him to be able to do it. I believe there are just a lot of variables, different service ethoses (correct plural?), and so forth. AHS When I was in the Medical Rehabilitation Platoon in USMC boot camp in 1970 I was "guarding" a parking lot one day and overheard two officers talking about how much harder it was going to be to properly instill leadership in Lance Corporals (E-3s) now that the Viet Nam war was winding down and they weren't going to have any with combat experience. Joe -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air defense (naval and air force) | Mike | Military Aviation | 0 | September 18th 04 04:42 PM |
Navy College Programs | WaLDo Michael | Military Aviation | 5 | July 8th 04 08:21 PM |
Navy or Air Farce? | Elmshoot | Naval Aviation | 103 | March 22nd 04 07:10 PM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 4 | February 21st 04 09:01 PM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 2 | February 12th 04 12:52 AM |