![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "James M. Knox" wrote in message ... Pat Barry wrote in : Renting out an aircraft is a commercial operation in itself, It's renting of a piece of property. It is a commercial operation and will require the renter to hold a state sales certificate (although not have to pay state tax in most states). aircraft cannot be used in any operation for compensation or hire beyond the currency of the 100 hours inspection. But it can be flown by the renter, or his pilot (including a flight instructor *the renter provides*, as long as it is in annual and otherwise airworthy. No 100 hour inspection is required. Nope, go read your own FAA opinion again. I can assure you that when a plane is out of a hundred hour inspection that it cannot be rented out. I hate to quote FSDO web sites, because they are frequently in error. But from, for instance, the Albany FSDO website: "Aircraft rental by itself isn't "for hire," and applicants bring the airplane to me for the test. However, the aircraft may have a recurring AD that requires compliance every 100 hours, so although the 100-hour inspection may be unnecessary, AD compliance may be." More officially, here's an FAA Chief Counsel letter interp: May 3, 1984 Mr. Perry Rackers Jefferson City Flying Service Dear Mr. Rackers This is in reply to your request of May 1, 1984, that we render an opinion regarding the applicability of the 100-hour inspections requirement of Section 91.169(b) of the Federal Aviation Regulations to rental aircraft. Section 91.169(b) of the Federal Aviation Regulations provides that, except as noted in Section 91.169(c), a person may not operate an aircraft carrying any person, other than a crewmember, for hire, and may not give flight instruction for hire in an aircraft which that person provides unless, within the previous 100 hours of time in service, the aircraft has received either an annual or a 100-hour inspection. If a person merely leases or rents an aircraft to another person and does not provide the pilot, that aircraft is not required by Section 91.169(b) of the Federal Aviation Regulations to have a 100-hour inspection. As noted above, the 100-hour inspection is required only when the aircraft is carrying a person for hire, or when a person is providing flight instruction for hire, in their own aircraft. If there are any questions, please advise us. Sincerely, /s/ Joseph T. Brennan Associate Regional Counsel I'm afraid you are mistaken. Wouldn't be the first time... but not in this case. jmk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
Home Inspection Listings | Patrick Glenn | Home Built | 4 | April 26th 04 11:52 AM |
51st Fighter Wing betters rating to ‘excellent’ with inspection | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | February 20th 04 11:29 PM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |