![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
Here's his reasons: 1) Apache has two Lycoming O-320 engines that go 2000 hours without a lot of maintenance. The Bonanza has an E-225 that goes 1500 hours and usually needs cylinder work along the way. Not true. Engines last depending on how you take care of them and how often you fly them. Assuming the E-225 engine parts are readily available an overhaul will run about $15K. An O-320 will run about $10-12K for a $20-24K total. Well, parts for an E-225 are NOT readily available. Try finding a new thrust bearing. The rear accessory case will usually need specialized machining that is getting harder and harder to get done. IIRC the overhaul of my E-225 in 1996 was $18K. When it dies, I'm going to look real hard at replacing it with a 470. 2) The Bonanza parts are expensive, Piper parts are less so. The Piper will break down more. Could be. I've never owned a Piper. But Bonanza parts ARE expensive. Ratheon wants $400 for the door hinge on my plane. 3) The annuals will be comparable (He thought an Apache annual would be about $1200, which I think is a little low) As in "never in a million years" that low. Ah, er, there is something goofy about that. I pay about that on my owner assisted annuals. I can imagine anything that is the same age, but has twice the engines being cheaper. 4) Fuel burn in the Apache is about 16 gallons / hour, but the Bonanza is going to burn about 13 gallons / hour, so 3 gallons / hour isn't that much. I only see 13 gph in my full rich, full throttle climbs. In cruise its under ten. 5) The props on the Apache are better / less expensive to maintain than either the Beech 215 electric prop or the hydraulic props on the Bonanzas. Well, the electric prop is an orphan. However, it has no ADs and provides the best performance for an E powered plane (assuming its using 88 inch blades). The Hartzel has a recurrent AD that runs me about $400 every 250 hours. -- Frank Stutzman Bonanza N494B "Hula Girl" (1949 A35 E-225 powered, hartzel prop) Hood River, OR |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Modern Inventions early Science 1900s airships FA | LindaBeynon | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 7th 05 12:41 AM |
Apache crews sharpen gunfighting skills | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 11th 04 11:45 PM |
WTB: Nose Gear Assembly for Early Model Bonanza | Eric Ulmer | Aviation Marketplace | 4 | November 16th 03 10:50 PM |
UK pilots start Apache training | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 13th 03 10:37 PM |
Early morning hotel-to-airport | Bob Fry | General Aviation | 21 | July 25th 03 05:51 AM |