![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Julian Scarfe" wrote in message ...
We have an Aerox system with cannulas and find it good. According to Aerox, the system uses less oxygen than a mask would. Concur, although the system we have is Mountain High (same oxymiser cannulae though). They work very well and live up to their name. IIRC the system itself has a recommendation about how high they can be used vs. the mask, and there's an article about this on AvWeb somewhere. Might be worth a hunt. We don't have the pulse oxymeter but have had no problems at 14K (15K above our service ceiling). I'm kind of a "canary in a coal mine", if there are problems I'll find them. One of the things I hadn't anticipated was how much better I'd feel on oxygen after longish flights even around FL100. Concur again, but even lower in our experience -- 7-8K (Gotta admit Julian FL100 looks funny to this Yank) Cheers, Sydney |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Nelson 4-Place Oxygen Sportsmen System | Mary Kroening | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | June 18th 04 05:31 PM |
Securing portable oxygen | dutch | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | February 10th 04 05:30 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Portable oxygen system suggestions... | hnelson | General Aviation | 9 | August 12th 03 12:02 AM |
Portable oxygen system suggestions... | hnelson | Owning | 3 | August 11th 03 08:39 AM |