![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just saw in this month's AOPA (Fall flights):
"Most pilots slumming around the pattern on a hot summer day will probably not flip the pitot heat on, but certainly anytime you're flying in or near moisture - at any air temperature - It's safest to use pitot heat." - Editor in Chief, Thomas B. Haines. Well that would cover at least half the time. Probably more if one forgets to turn it off when the clouds finally slip out of sight. Does this seem preposterous to anybody else? Maybe its because my instructor covered up the airspeed indicator of the J3 cub for an entire flight during my private training just to make sure I wasn't becoming too dependent on it. Frankly it didn't seem too hard to fly without it. Since the cub had no stall warning system, I did use up more of the dirt patch next to the runway than usual. (My instructor never actually let me use the runway. He said that was too easy.) In the past 20 years of flying my C185, I've flown without the airspeed indicator several times. Twice it failed to work because of stuff in the pitot tube. Once I just couldn't see it because there was no moon and I had a total electrical system failure. (Actually I did have a flashlight in my pocket, but I didn't see a great motivation for getting it out. I just landed in the dark.) Twice I saw the airspeed indicator rapidly head to zero because of icing conditions. (My icing early warning system ![]() altitude indications from the other instruments it never crossed my mind to make any control inputs in response. Flipping the pitot heater on restored the airspeed indicator within seconds. (Well airspeed is at least a nice convenience.) So Mr. Haines' suggestion seems somewhat radical to me. (Ok, I guess I would use it in the cold soup when I'm already dealing with a loss of vacuum system emergency.) Just think of all that power wasted. And is really safer? Perhaps having it on so often would mean that it would more likely be burnt out one of those few times it would be really nice to have. And maybe it would snuff out that last 10 minutes of battery capacity that you needed to complete your approach, because it took you awhile to recognize that the alternator went belly up. But he certainly has more experience than my meager 3000 hours, so what do I know? Reminds me of the instructions in the POH of my Decathlon that says I should leave the electrical fuel pump on during takeoff because gravity feed alone is not sufficient to produce takeoff power in the event the engine driven fuel pump fails. Gosh, what are we - like the monkeys on the early space missions. Can't we just turn on the switch when we need it? (I've already replaced that very expensive electrical pump twice because me or one of my partners forgot to turn it off after climbout. It is not robust enough to run it continuously. I've since given up on following the POH exactly.) ~Paul Mennen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Burning out the pitot heat? | Mitty | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | December 30th 04 05:04 AM |
Painting and air cooled motor? | CitizenX | Home Built | 5 | June 30th 04 12:47 PM |
28 volt pitot heat | B2431 | Home Built | 15 | April 17th 04 03:25 PM |
pitot heat question | K. Ari Krupnikov | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | December 11th 03 01:51 AM |
"I'll spend as much of YOUR money as I want!" - Bu$h's Sunday Presidential Address | B2431 | Military Aviation | 91 | September 14th 03 10:05 PM |