![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Lesher wrote:
writes: Back in the "good old days" when I was an avionics tech, they HAD to put things in the back; the equipment was just too big to fit it all behind the panel. The equipment rack in the back of your average Cessna/Piper is no heaven for equipment. It vibrates just as much and it is actually hotter than behind the panel. Remember, there are no vents back there while up front you have cabin vents. But you can easily have ventilation. You don't need outside air; a few boxer fans will help a great deal. The big thing is you have volume and *access*. The big issue I see is protecting against cokes spilled on/through the seat. Hmmm, more wires to run, more stuff to put in the plane. The equipment didn't go under the rear seat; it went behind the panel behind the bagage compartment. Most of the problems with the old MK-12 solid state inverter power supplies and the AT-5 transponders were due to the heat and vibration in the back. We're talking an order of magnitude more heat in a MK-12 inverter than for a current whole stack, I bet... I seem to recall those even used geranium transistors... Probably slightly less heat, and yes, the transistors were germanium. Can't see why vibration is worse under the rear seat; only that the panel has mounts. So, put stuff on mounts. The vibration is the same; if you wanted it to last you DID put it on mounts. Running cables of any kind from the back to behind the panel is also highly labor intensive when done correctly. Agreed. But one real plus is fiber, even mil-spec "tank-proof" fiber, is tiny as compared to the ahem equine reproductive equipment it replaces here. (I installed LOTS of those in police cars years ago..) The diameter (up to a point) of a cable bundle isn't an issue; it's having to run it at all. And you end up running coax from each antenna, mike/headphone/etc up into a very tight location where you work by feel.... Fiber all avoids ground loops as well. I could see a audio panel with a front panel for control, a knee-level jack panel for mikes/headphones/PTT/CD player in, and a 2nd in the rear for those passengers. You didn't have ground loops back then with wires either if you put stuff in correctly. While you could replace a lot of the wiring with a fiber optic data cable, you still have to run power back there and you still have to keep the cables protected and out of the workings. Plus splicing and putting connectors correctly on fiber is a pain in the butt. I'd buy connectorized flexible duplex jumpers. But yes, you'd need to run power there. Good place for the avionics master contactor. Hmmm, 3 more wires; power in, power out, and control or have 2 separate contactors for the front and rear stuff and avoid the power out? -- A host is a host from coast to & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433 -- Jim Pennino Remove -spam-sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Big Bertha Thing blogs | Tony Lance | Owning | 14 | January 19th 05 10:17 PM |
Big Bertha Thing blogs | Tony Lance | Military Aviation | 9 | August 31st 04 11:01 PM |
OSH - the chair thing | Montblack | Owning | 9 | July 24th 03 08:19 PM |
SUV thing | Fastglasair | Home Built | 4 | July 12th 03 05:32 AM |