A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Getting a little sick of it all



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20  
Old March 4th 04, 08:32 PM
MRQB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

More than on BOZO.


"Mark Astley" wrote in message
...
Regarding not flying for a while...

When I bought my PA28-140 I noticed a 1 year or so gap where no flying was
done (or at least, nothing logged such as oil changes, 100 hour

inspections,
etc). It turns out this occurred about the time the infamous main spar AD
came out which mandated pulling wings and other expensive procedures. A

lot
of PA28 owners went into a holding pattern on this one (rather than
immediately drop mucho $$) because it was so onerous (the AD was later
rescinded but the piper service bulletin remained). I don't know for sure
that this is what happened, but it's a plausible explanation for the
inactivity (the previous owner didn't offer up this explanation, I put 2

and
2 together after looking through the logs).

But the point about things corroding during inactivity is valid. So

before
I closed the deal, and after the prepurchase came up clean, I verified

that
at least the "anti-corrosion" service bulletin had been complied with.

This
one required pulling the fuel tanks, inspecting the main spar, and

applying
an anti-corrosive. The point being that in some cases, you can do a

little
homework and be reasonably sure that things are clean.

To MRQB: hang in there, don't let some bozo spoil the fun of looking for
your ride.

blue skies,
mark

"Matthew P. Cummings" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 04:48:48 -0800, MRQB wrote:

Yes he is a real A & P, IA and is the only one I trust out of a

handful
that
I have meet and interviewed around here.


If he told you that because the plane did not fly for 2 years and that's
why it had missing logs he's daft, find another A&P. That's most
definitely not missing logs. A plane can have years where there's lot

of
work logged, others when it's mostly oil changes and an annual, and if
they don't fly it and don't get an annual then nothing gets logged, but
the amount of entries does not determine if it's missing. Now if you

saw
that the pages were gone, the tach numbers don't add up, that's more
likely to be missing logs.

Now, it's still debatable as to whether the plane should have been
purchased without it's flying in 2 years, often you'll find problems
cropping up due to the inactivity and hidden corrosion. You were

probably
better off passing on it anyhow.






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FDR and Bush 43 WalterM140 Military Aviation 44 June 24th 04 12:16 AM
Sick Boeing Joke. plasticguy Home Built 0 April 1st 04 03:16 PM
Home Builders are Sick Sick Puppies pacplyer Home Built 11 March 26th 04 12:39 AM
Note from a Sick Puppy Veeduber Home Built 4 March 21st 04 10:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.