![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Geoffrey Barnes" wrote in message
k.net... It is not his fault that the airplane broke. Agreed. As a Devil's advocate point, though, it's also not a VFR pilot's fault when the weather closes in and traps them at a remote airport. But it's still the renter's responsiblity to get that plane back home so that other people can use it, even if it means paying for two IFR club members to come get the plane. Actually, policies vary according to FBO and club. The club I did the most renting from had a very explicit policy that weather-related delays or cancellations would not incur additional fees (such as overnight tie-down, daily minimums, etc.) Just as it's in the FBO's or club's interest to not encourage a pilot to fly an unairworthy airplane, it is in their interest to not encourage a pilot to fly in poor weather. Now, it's true that if the pilot just left the plane there and took alternative transportation home, leaving the plane for someone else to pick up, the pilot would have to pay for those costs. But that's a different situation from an unairworthy airplane. The FBO or club don't warrant the weather and weather-related delays are a normal part of all flying, but they do warrant the airworthiness of the airplane. A renter should not be expected to sit around and wait for an airplane to be repaired just so that the FBO or club who warranted the airworthiness of the airplane in the first place can avoid additional expenses retrieving the airplane. If the renter is willing to do so, they should expect their expenses to be covered (hotel, meals, cab fare, etc.) by the owner of the airplane, up to whatever the owner of the airplane would have spent anyway (whether by paying for overtime service, or sending someone else to get the airplane). Maintenance and airworthiness *ought* to be the number one priority for any FBO or club. Above all else, they should ensure that renters are not expected to help cover their costs when something breaks. After all, how do they establish and maintain trust with their customers otherwise? I certainly wouldn't rent an airplane from an operation where I ran the risk of having to pay for their errors. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members | Andrew Gideon | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | June 12th 04 03:03 AM |
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members | Andrew Gideon | General Aviation | 0 | June 12th 04 02:14 AM |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 05:39 AM |
September issue of Afterburner now on line | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 9th 03 09:13 PM |