![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I first heard about this plane I thought it would be cool idea -- a
new, two-person touring plane that will cost about $150K with good avionics. But the more I learn about it, strictly from reading magazine articles, the more I wonder. For example: 1. Fingertip brakes next to the throttle. I know magazine reviewers are reluctant to criticize any plane, so when the AOPA pilot reviewer wryly said that surgeons and concert pianists would have no problem with these controls, I had to wonder. 2. Currently life-limited to 225 hours (that's right, 225). And we in this newsgroup were criticizing Cirrus for the 4350 limit on the SR22. I know they plan to increase this number as the fleet ages, but this means no one knows what the number will ultimately be, and everyone who puts a lot of time in a Liberty is a certification test pilot. 3. Challenging to get into, it's not clear they will be putting steps on the production models. 4. On the test flight with AOPA pilot, the designer suggested slowing down to pattern speed before descending, because the plane is hard to slow down. 5. nonadjustable seats. I know the rudder pedals are adjustable, but that doesn't help short or tall pilots with headroom or visbility. and not everyone likes the same seatback angle. The biggest plus is the pure FADEC engine, all you have to do is move the lever and mixture, carb heat, etc are automatically done for you. That's a big plus and is probably this plane's best innovation. Also gives efficient cruise. I know some people who feel we should support the manufacturers who "do something new" would think it's heresy, but at what point to "innovations" become "quirks."? Let's see, this plane is hard to taxi, hard to slow down, hard to get into, and is life-limited to a small number of hours (and no one knows what the final limit will be. ) I guess if you own one you adjust to all the quirks, but I can't help but think whenever I read a review of a plane like this what kind of capability the same price would fetch on the used market in a plane that is easier to get into, taxi, and slow down. Has anyone flown one of these? If so what do you think of it? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USS Liberty Challenge/Reward | Issac Goldberg | Naval Aviation | 75 | July 16th 04 09:28 PM |
USS LIBERTY CASE EVIDENCE JUSTIFIES REOPENING | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 0 | April 2nd 04 08:31 PM |
USS LIBERTY CASE EVIDENCE JUSTIFIES REOPENING | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 2nd 04 08:31 PM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 4 | February 21st 04 09:01 PM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 2 | February 12th 04 12:52 AM |