![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fly Commercial. Let someone else make the decision so you stay alive.
The have to get there mentality leads to a grave. Michelle O. Sami Saydjari wrote: Mike Rapoport wrote: Considering the requirement of 250kts or better there are no piston airplanes to consider. No turboprop will meet the $200/hr requirement. I doubt that a pressurized piston twin will meet the $200/hr requirment either You can get the range, speed, load hauling and altitude if you spend more on operating cost or you can get the stated operating and aqusition cost if you are willing to go 200kts.instead of 250. Well, perhaps I can back-off on the operating costs a bit. Any idea on how far i would have to back-off to make my speed goal? Keep in mind that you are going to spend about $5000 a year on training and over $10,000 (maybe $20K) on insurance. If you fly 100hrs a year (25,000 nm of travel, a lot), then insurance and training will cost $150/hr. Wow, interesting. I did not imagine insureance would be quite that much. There is a point of rapidly dimishing returns on going faster. The cost goes up geometrically and the time saved goes down less than linearly because of taxi and approach speed restrictions. Yes, but for long trips, like mine, it seems worth it. For a 1-2 hour trip, I can definitely see your point, but for 4-5 hour trips, it seems that the trip time savings is significant. I would focus on more weather capability (two engines, radar, known ice) and take whatever speed that comes with the package. Yes. Good points. Known ice will be key for me. For business travel, I need to be able to go when I need to go. Mike MU-2 "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote in message ... I now own a PA28R201T, Piper Turbo Arrow III. It is a great plane (although, as some of you know, I have had more than my share of "challenges"). At altitude it cruises at 170 knots. Cost to operate is around $90/hour (figuring maintenance and such). My range requirement is 660nm with 45 minutes of fuel left offer. I most often fly it single-pilot IFR. Lately, I have begun thinking about the next step up, which I am planning for 2 years from now...but one can't start too early to consider options. So, here are my goals. Range: 600nm with IFR reserve Speed: 250 knots or better Ceiling: 25,000 or better (Pressurized Cabin) Passengers: 4 seater Operating Cost: Would prefer round trip, 1320nm, cost less than $1000 Budget: $500K Suggestions would be most welcome. I would like to narrow the search down to 2 or 3 that comes as close as possible to my requirements. Is a turbo-prop out of the question? Thanks in advance. -Sami N2057M, Piper Turbo Arrow III -- Michelle P ATP-ASEL, CP-AMEL, and AMT-A&P "Elisabeth" a Maule M-7-235B (no two are alike) Volunteer Pilot, Angel Flight Mid-Atlantic Volunteer Builder, Habitat for Humanity |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Want simple flight planning software | marc | Home Built | 13 | December 20th 04 04:36 AM |
Pre-flight planning really is worth doing. | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | August 25th 04 10:17 PM |
Route planning question | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | April 4th 04 02:40 PM |
Re; What do you think? | Kelsibutt | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 29th 03 06:55 AM |