![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dude" wrote in message ...
Well, I have never heard of anyone being held on the field at a Pace event. If that were to happen, then we should all hear about it, and find out who got fired. Fired? That's a good one! OTOH, the FAA is the FAA. I suspect that your example is misleading, because that type of plane is exactly what they want to fix. If a plane was seriously dangerous due to physical imperfection, rather than log problems, I suppose someone might get strongly pressured to not fly it out. But it would have to be an obvious hazard that no reasonable pilot would want to ignore. As far as the FAA is concerned, paperwork is what makes a plane fly. The interpretation of the regs appears to be at the whim of the inspector and varies from FSDO to FSDO (and even between inspectors in the same FSDO). Let's suppose an inspector found something, say an STC, that wasn't properly logged (in his opinion). According to the regs, your airplane would not be airworthy in paperwork sense. Are we supposed to trust that the FAA is going to look the other way as we climb into our unairworthy (on paper) airplane and fly it home to the shop? Most of the FSDO inspectors that I know would not put their butts on the line like that. More likely, you'd have to jump through the hoops required for a ferry permit. I know dozens of airplane and FBO owners and no one (so far) has ever seriously considered participating in this program. It has nothing to do with whether an airplane is actually airworthy and exposes you to the regulatory whims of your local FSDO. The best bet for a good assesment of actual airworthiness is still an experienced IA. If your example were real, the program would end up being a joke. I didn't actually give an example in my first post, just pointed out possible pitfalls. Most owners I know think that the program is a joke and wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole. As I said in my first post, it requires you to believe that the FAA is "here to help". John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|