![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The TWs are all a little different from what I've heard. The Maule is the
only one I've flown. You really have a choice of 3point configs - Landing flaps will allow you to arrive right at what I'd call "the end of elevator authority". Not quite a stall but you are done unless you add power. On the other hand, take-off flaps, 0 flaps or negative flaps (a Maule feature) allow you to fly it on with authority. All positions approved for landing in the ops manual. I've certainly heard that the Maules handle grass fine. But I'm afraid that my combination of 3300', 50' obstructions both ends, and surface quality makes it a little too tight for regular operations, close to gross, at 95 degrees. I've never completely run the numbers but even with that light early model 21, takeoff would be dicey. Then the wet wing.... and all. Bo's and Commanche's seem to handle it OK but the Mooney seems to push the limits a bit. But I love that wing on it. "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message om... "Maule Driver" wrote in message . com... I'm not sure I'm strong enough for the tailwheel trick - I guess that applies to Cubs and such. No one is picking up a Maule tail like that. OTOH, there is much advice warning against wheelies in the Maule. I can do 'em but don't because you don't need 'em. You can fly it on 3 points quite nicely with reduced or neg flaps. Still don't know exactly why but make and model wise, it just doesn't need to be in your kit. The Maule is one of the tailwheels I've not flown. 3pts are nice and a plane's behavior in a 3pt often is related to how close (or far) from stall it is in a 3pt attitude. In the Swift it is recommended that you NOT 3 pt it because the 3pt attitude is so far beyond stalls, most pilots just end up dropping it in (notice that most Swifts have wrinkles on the top of the wings). In some planes you are still totally flying at 3pt attitude (Citabria for example). Wish I could operate a Mooney off my grass.... My Mooney does fine off grass and even beaches (I've flown off a couple in Mexico). The grass just can't be too deep or the holes too deep. Our local grass field (C14) has big gopher holes all over it so I've never taken a nose wheel plane in there. I love taking the Swift, Aeronca, and C140 into that field. The runway threshold has powerlines over it and a giant oak tree hanging over the runway. You can't go below these because its backed up against a levy. Some people land the other direction but then a go-around is suicide. When my kids were young they referred to C14 as "the airport where the planes live in the grass". -Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"bush flying" in the suburbs? | [email protected] | Home Built | 85 | December 28th 04 11:04 PM |
Mooney M20 K on Grass ? | Andrew Boyd | Owning | 0 | August 13th 04 03:00 PM |
VW-1 C-121J landing with unlocked nose wheel | Mel Davidow LT USNR Ret | Military Aviation | 1 | January 19th 04 05:22 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Off topic - Landing of a B-17 | Ghost | Home Built | 2 | October 28th 03 04:35 PM |