![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Todd Pattist wrote
when two MEI's take a 1-hour XC flight somewhere and each one comes back with a BFR endorsement from the other, that's bull****, and we all know it. And even this bull**** flight is not clearly a violation of the FAR's. OK, there's some grey area there. Sort of like that panel rebuild on a logbook signature - every individual change could be considered minor, so we'll consider the entire operation minor. There's no clear requirement that I handle the controls for more than 50% of the BFR flight time.. If the instructor giving me a BFR wants to show me flight maneuvers and then see me repeat them, he's free to do so. There's no requirement as to how long the instructor can touch the controls during my BFR, so this 50/50 one hour flight with two cross-BFR's doesn't seem to me to be an unequivocal violation of the FAR's No, but it still totally fails to conform to the spirit of the regulation. And that's why we have a FSDO deciding they're not going to accept that. The guy who took an aerobatics course, however, is just caught in the crossfire - he did conform to the spirit of the regs. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|