![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David....remember that there is an election coming up in 2004.
Bob Gardner "David H" wrote in message ... Will Alaska (and other states with votes that the administration thinks they can woo) also get an exemption from the recent legislation that specifies that seafood inspectors are "inherantly governmental" and thus can't be privatized? The Bush administration sure does seem to have a major bug up its ass about forcing ATC privatization - WHY? At the same time they're declaring things like seafood inspectors are inherantly governmental (not to mention those federal employees who screen baggage for nail clippers). There's something here that doesn't quite add up. They seem really, really intent on pushing ATC privatization. What's really behind this? Who stands to gain from ATC privatization? Are there major businesses that do this now, and others that are quietly preparing to pick up some fat federal ATC contracts? Do these companies have any connection to the white house and friends? "Follow the money...." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tower Enroute Control? | Sam Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | June 2nd 04 02:31 AM |
Control Tower Controversy brewing in the FAA | PlanetJ | Instrument Flight Rules | 168 | December 6th 03 01:51 PM |
Preferred Routing or Tower Enroute Control | cefarthing | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | November 30th 03 04:53 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 05:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |