![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 16-Oct-2003, "Dan Luke" c172rgATbellsouthDOTnet wrote: ...in the USA instead of 400,000 or so: There would be GA airports *everywhere*. They would be like beehives on the day before Thanksgiving. I think what you mean is that there would be few places without convenient access to/from a GA airport You could rent a T hangar for less than the cost of a 1 br apartment. More likely GA airplanes would be designed with features like folding wings to make storage more efficient The accident rate would be about the same but the fatal accident rate would be lower due to modern, more crashworthy designs. The real key to even getting to that level of GA use would be to make it practical for GA airplanes and pilots to safely operate IFR in pretty much the same mix of weather that the airlines fly in. The biggest challenges: practical and low cost ice protection and weather visualization (the latter rapidly becoming a reality) and greatly simplified IFR procedures (so that 25 million pilots could operate "in the system." You'd give the engine in your airplane about as much thought as you do the one in your car. The idea of sending oil samples off for analysis at each change would seem absurd. But aircraft engines would continue to cost a lot more than auto engines -- just not ten times as much. Your new "family" airplane would be air conditioned. Maybe. Still a big weight penalty and not needed nearly as universally as AC in cars It would have a headup synthetic vision/HITS display, emergency autoland capability, real time data link weather and a CD/DVD player. It would certainly have a lot of "high tech" avionics, but the demands of traffic control in an environment with 25 million pilots would dominate their functionality. You'd have a second, "fun" airplane. Maybe, but even with mass production techniques airplanes would still cost lots more than cars -- just not 10 times as much. 40-year old airplanes would all be junkers or lovingly restored classics. Probably right. Vacuum pumps would be deep in landfills. Everything that COULD be electronic WOULD be electronic. You would certainly have redundant electrical systems Air traffic control would automated for most functions. It would have to be to manage the 50-fold increase in traffic. Oh, and by the way, there would undoubtedly need to be enforced positive control in virtually all airspace with the possible exception of parts of Alaska Regulation enforcement officers would be flying around, watching and listening, but federal enforcement actions would be more uniform and fair due to more lawyers and politicians getting busted and raising hell. The reason for more uniform (and aggressive) enforcement of regulations would be that with 25 million users the system would collapse without it Frogs could dance and the Cubs would win the World Series. Naw, its not as unlikely as the Cubs winning the Series. ------- -Elliott Drucker |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |