![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry
A current program using a F-5 has demonstrated modeling of airframe that will reduce sonic booms. This has been published a number of places. Big John On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 16:20:30 GMT, Larry Dighera wrote: On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:02:08 -0600, "Montblack" wrote in Message-Id: : While the usual inanity contained in articles posted by Montblack are easily dismissed, this caught my eye: "Styled by the laws of nature.............Concorde" It seems that the next generation of supersonic airliners may be permitted to fly over the US (to the west coast where I reside): http://www.discoverychannel.co.uk/ne...rticle01.shtml The shape of jets to come AS TICKETS for Concorde's final flight go on sale this week, an American aerospace company has demonstrated a way to modify a supersonic jet to dramatically reduce its sonic boom. The work could pave the way for a new generation of business jets quiet enough to fly at supersonic speed over populated areas. Sonic booms are one of the biggest drawbacks of supersonic flight. They are the sharp thunderclaps caused by shock waves created at the nose and tail of an aircraft meeting as they travel to the ground. Where the shock waves overlap they reinforce each other, creating the boom. Concorde's boom is so loud that it is forbidden from flying at supersonic speeds over land. In the 1970s, Richard Seebass and Albert George at Cornell University in New York came up with a straightforward way to counter the problem. They reasoned that a shock wave would be weaker if it were spread out over a larger area. This could be achieved by replacing a plane's sharp nose with a blunter shape and redesigning parts of the wings, for example where the base of the wing meets the fuselage, so that the angles between surfaces do not change so sharply. The idea was to allow the shock waves to form over larger areas of the aircraft's surface. Years of computer modelling and wind tunnel tests have validated the concept, but it had never been tried in flight. Now the American aerospace company Northrop Grumman ... http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993616 ... New chapter A supersonic successor will be very different in design, Jackson told New Scientist: "There will be such an interval before any supersonic transport gets going again, that we'll start on a separate chapter of air travel." Bill Gunston, editor of Jane's Aero Engines and author of the book Faster Than Sound, believes dramatic improvements in aerodynamics over the last 30 years would now make it possible to build a much far more efficient supersonic craft than Concorde. He says the airplane's lift-to-drag ratio means it requires very powerful engines and huge amounts of fuel. "Any capable design outfit could design something vastly superior to Concorde," Junston told New Scientist. ... http://uk.news.yahoo.com/030929/12/e9q0q.html Monday September 29, 04:00 PM Curvy aircraft could silence sonic booms By David L. Chandler As tickets for Concorde's final flight go on sale this week, an American aerospace company has demonstrated a way to modify a supersonic jet to dramatically reduce its sonic boom. The work could pave the way for a new generation of business jets quiet enough to fly at supersonic speed over populated areas. Sonic booms are one of the biggest drawbacks of supersonic flight. They are the thunderclaps caused when shock waves created at the nose and tail of an aircraft meet as they travel to the ground. Where the shock waves overlap they reinforce each other, creating the boom. Concorde's boom is so loud that the plane is forbidden from flying at supersonic speeds over land. In the 1970s, Richard Seebass and Albert George at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, came up with a straightforward way to counter the problem. They reasoned that a shock wave would be weaker if it were spread out over a larger area. This could be achieved by replacing a plane's sharp nose with a blunter shape and redesigning parts of the wings, for example where the base of the wing meets the fuselage, so that the angles between surfaces do not change so abruptly. The idea was to force the shock waves to fan out more rapidly as they move away from these curves, spreading out their energy. Years of computer modelling and wind tunnel tests have validated the concept, but it had never been tried in flight. Now the American aerospace company Northrop Grumman has ... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The perfect approach | Capt.Doug | Home Built | 25 | December 3rd 04 03:37 AM |
Dynon EFIS D-10 Magnetic heading | Paul Lee | Home Built | 3 | November 15th 04 08:41 PM |
Wouldn't it be... PERFECT JUSTICE... if Frances... | X98 | Military Aviation | 0 | September 4th 04 08:27 AM |
Sonic Booms No More? (Was: Perfect electro-magnetic storm) | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 5 | October 30th 03 03:34 PM |