![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jay Honeck" writes:
In wideangle work, and especially in architectural photography, you need to get *really* anal about setting the camera level (or learn how to correct it later). I've actually got a level I can put in my "flash" shoe; but most of the time I just line up the edges of the frame with various vertical lines, and get it level enough that way. Interesting. Photos that Mary takes are always (and I mean ALWAYS) three degrees "off" to one side or the other. Using Photoshop I always have to "rotate" the photo back to level. The next step after that is to learn how to correct for tilts *forward* and *backwards* (which cause parallel vertical lines to converge or diverge). We figure it's something to do with her eyes. (Probably why she can't hit a baseball, either...) Could well be. Lots of the photos really need brightness and contrast adjustment, too. And I just noticed, looking at photos of the Red Baron suite, that you seem to be somehow using 300k for a quality of image I can generally provide with only 60k; that would make a *big* difference to people on dial-up connections. (And those photos would really benefit from being shot level, too.) Yeah, I've learned a lot about down-sizing photos since then. Take a gander at the Amelia Earhart Suite, and see if the photos aren't more properly sized? If anything, they're a bit *larger* than the ones I complained about earlier. (Not counting the one of the newspaper article; I haven't played with it, to retain legibility that could need to be rather large). 367KB to 600KB. Wow. The one labeled "The bedroom in natural sunlight" (Queen bed in suite.jpg) is 1.3MB, and still has the EXIF information in it (I see you shot it at 1/20 second at f2.8 with a Canon S100 :-)). It's also 1600x1200 pixels, not resized to a reasonable screen size; I'd suspect it of being the camera original file, except that the EXIF info says Photoshop 7 has been at it. Maybe the files on the web site (for the Emelia Earhart suite) are not the ones you think are there? -- David Dyer-Bennet, , www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: noguns-nomoney.com www.dd-b.net/carry/ Photos: dd-b.lighthunters.net Snapshots: www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: dragaera.info/ |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 11:46 PM |
| Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 10:45 PM |
| Trial Of Woman Accused Of Killing Military Husband Postponed | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 24th 04 01:05 AM |
| Marine Corps jet crashes in California, killing pilot | Matt | Naval Aviation | 0 | July 23rd 03 10:58 PM |
| Car plows through market, killing 8 | David Gunter | Piloting | 4 | July 19th 03 10:04 AM |