![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Gideon wrote
For what type of insurance? Aircraft liability and hull, of course. Obviously when I speak about increased proficiency offsetting increased exposure, there are limits on both ends. For example, if one is going to fly less than 5 hours a year or so, I would argue that less is better - there is no proficiency to speak of, so minimizing exposure is best. By the same token, if one is going to fly more than 250 hours a year or so, there is no extra proficiency to be gained. The extra time merely increases exposure. In general, an aircraft owner is going to fly more than 5 but fewer than 250 hours a year. There are exceptions, but they are few and far between. My insurance company won't even cover you in a PA-30 if you haven't logged 80+ hours in make and model in the past year. Others will - but at much higher prices. Many people I know get lower rates for flying more than 100 hours a year. However, I have yet to see a break past that point. Nobody I know will give you an additional discount for 200, or 500. Clearly there is a crossowver point where increased exposure to risks largely beyond the pilot's control offsets the risk reduction through increased proficiency. There is no increased premium for those flying over 500 hours a year, but I strongly suspect this is only because there are not enough people with that kind of utilization on a personal airplane. Commercially employed pilots typically fly 500+ hours a year. At that point, the increased proficiency seems to be offset by increased exposure. Being a commercial pilot is one of the most hazardous occupations out there. I've a private cert (with instrument rating). I plan to upgrade to commercial in the future. My life insurance agent, though, thought that this would adversely impact my life insurance. I suspect that once he understands that you are only going to have the rating, and are not actually going to fly commercially, this may not be a problem. More, he seemed to have difficulty getting me the insurance increase (appropriate now that I'm a parent) I wanted because I was a pilot. He'd no similar difficulty for my wife. Certainly. Being a pilot is going to mean SOME increased risk regardless of how proficienct you are. I'm wondering if this is typical, or if I should be shopping elsewhere. It's typical enough, but there are a few companies that claim to offer their best rates to pilots. No experience with them - I have no life insurance at all. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models | Ale | Owning | 3 | October 22nd 13 03:40 PM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Owning | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Piloting | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |