![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All those people who worry about explosive decompression, innocent
bystanders getting shot, etc., are missing the point. If a sky marshal (or pilot, for that matter) really has to get into a fight with a terrorist, odds are you are going to lose the airplane. Either the terrorist will set off a bomb or the aircraft will be so damaged during the fight that it will crash. This is still better odds of survival for the passengers and crew than simply shooting down the hijacked aircraft, which the military will scramble to do the moment that somebody tries to take over the airplane. The sky marshal has only a very limited time to regain control. Otherwise the jet will be shot down, no questions asked. So whatever the marshal can do, at whatever cost, is better than the alternative. Either alternative is better than letting a terrorist take control of an aircraft and fly it into a crowd of people or some valuable object. I would think that a pilot on a threatened aircraft would gradually reduce the cabin pressure enough to cause the passengers to pass out. This could be done in less time than it would probably take to break through the cockpit door. The bad guys probably would not even notice and might even experience a moment of euphoria. Once the passenger cabin is properly subdued the pilots could make their way back and give oxygen to the sky marshals, disarm the terrorists, and guarantee that control would be maintained after everybody wakes up while the airplane is descending to land. This last alternative would still be very dangerous. The terrorists might still set off a bomb, either before they pass out or after they wake up. The oxygen masks dropping in the cabin would might tip them off to what was happening, although the masks sometimes deploy during a hijacking anyway. -- Christopher J. Campbell World Famous Flight Instructor Port Orchard, WA If you go around beating the Bush, don't complain if you rile the animals. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GNS 480 means no GNS 430 upgrade ? | Scott Moore | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | September 4th 04 04:05 AM |
"Comrade's casualty abroad means grim duty at home" | Mike | Military Aviation | 0 | June 1st 04 09:21 PM |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
Air Vice Marshal Tony Dudgeon | Keith Willshaw | Military Aviation | 0 | January 9th 04 12:43 PM |
"Stand Alone" Boxes (Garmin 430) - Sole means of navigation - legal? | Richard | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | September 30th 03 02:13 PM |