![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave" wrote in message ... He also has an obligation to get as much information about the flight as he can. If the "intelligence" services have such information he should be provided with it. Likewise if the are FAMs on board he should know. Why? as the Commander he is legally responsible for what goes on with his flight. So if his aircraft is hijacked the commander is responsible? If the Feds can pick an choose when a commander is the commander and when he is not, where does that leave all pilots? The Feds are not doing that. The FARs make it very clear whose in charge. Show me where they have changed it. They haven't. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GNS 480 means no GNS 430 upgrade ? | Scott Moore | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | September 4th 04 04:05 AM |
"Comrade's casualty abroad means grim duty at home" | Mike | Military Aviation | 0 | June 1st 04 09:21 PM |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
Air Vice Marshal Tony Dudgeon | Keith Willshaw | Military Aviation | 0 | January 9th 04 12:43 PM |
"Stand Alone" Boxes (Garmin 430) - Sole means of navigation - legal? | Richard | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | September 30th 03 02:13 PM |