![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's the general viewpoint here?
A non-towered airport near us has two runways, shaped like an "L". Totally flat, no obstructions to vision-- airplane at the departure end for one can see airplanes at the other. Left traffic both, so the downwind for the short runway crosses the longer runway at midfield. The possible conflict points are simultaneous T/O, or crosswind for the short runway/downwind for the long. Today at that airport, one aircraft was in the pattern for the shorter runway, which the wind favored. I wanted to use the longer runway for various reasons, so exercising a sharp look-out and making my radio calls, I proceded to do so. Later another plane joined him. There were no conflicts AFAIK. Everyone was doing a good job making transmissions and keeping track of each other. It was a good exercise for me since our new home airport has a similar setup with both runways frequently in use -- and the added complication of right traffic in one direction, left in the other. I'm still getting used to it. When a fourth aircraft called in, I decided the spatial relationships were getting complicated and taxied over to the short run way, did one short field landing which my instructor would have liked and I didn't (power on), and headed for the horizon. Question is: how would most pilots here feel about this? Would you feel I should have just joined with traffic for the shorter runway? In terms of my plane's capabilities and mine, it's plenty of runway, no reason why not. It just wasn't what I preferred initially. I used to be based at that airport and it wasn't uncommon, if I was in the pattern for the short runway, to have other planes land on the long. It never bothered me except when someone came straight-in and obviously had no idea where the rest of the traffic was. But one of the planes in the pattern seemed to indicate, um, let's say displeasure with me. That doesn't concern me -- people have to say whatever they feel improves safety and presents them in a professional light, *hee* *hee*, and I kept my rule of "don't argue on freq. just don't and say you didn't" However I figure I should ask for a sanity-check on whether what's SOP at home is regarded as inappropriate or rude elsewhere. Cheers, Sydney |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
Rules on what can be in a hangar | Brett Justus | Owning | 13 | February 27th 04 05:35 PM |
Here's the Recompiled List of 82 Aircraft Accessible Aviation Museums! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 18 | January 20th 04 04:02 PM |
Here's the Recompiled List of 82 Aircraft Accessible Aviation Museums! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 16 | January 20th 04 04:02 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |