![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Federal government instituted CAPPS II this week. This is a more
enhanced version of current passenger screening/profiling where passengers are assigned a risk category of green, yellow, or red based on information a passenger is going to be required to provide before being allowed on the plane--namely, full name, date of birth, and home address. If done under the aegis of the government, vice private industry, it appears to be a clear violation of the 4th Amendment provisions against unreasonable search & seizure, and I'm sure it will be contested at some point. However, in the interim, I wonder if this isn't actually an unintended benefit to those of us in general aviation. Those of us who use our planes for business are probably aware of the "reasonable man" litmus test for deduction of flying expenses where commercial air is a viable option--e.g, it doesn't pass the "reasonable man" test to spend $2400 flying from NY to LA in a small plane when a commercial ticket could have been purchased for a fraction of that. The IRS would, rightfully in my opinion, disallow that deduction. Tax books cite case law instances to show what would be considered reasonable and what would not. It occurs to me that the invasiveness of CAPPS II and the general inconvenience of commercial air travel in this country, post-911, has signficantly altered the balance in this "reasonable man" calculation. In other words, it is easier to make a case, in general, to use one's plane for a legitimate business deduction, even when the cost of doing so is significantly higher than a commercial ticket. The potential for identify theft alone would be a justifiable reason to forego commercial air. With the information one is required to supply now under CAPPS II, plus a social security number, one would basically have the "keys to the kingdom" to steal someone's identity. I've followed the discussions in this newsgroup ever since 9/11 and there seems to be genuine concern over the loss of rights and privileges of active pilots. I'm not trying to diminish these concerns, but suggest that in sum, the attack of 9/11 and the subsequent over-reactions to it have actually made a pilot's certificate a ticket to much more freedom than was previously the case. As of today, it is the only way to fly in the countrry without giving the federal government your home address and date of birth. "A pilot, in those days, was the only unfettered and entirely independent human being that lived on earth."---Mark Twain (referring to Riverboat pilots, but I think it still stands true today) Hank Rausch |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|