![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was perusing some lists of Ultralight engines and noted that
the Limbach 275 was listed as 20 - 25 hp and 17 lb. I figured that was a typo, since it was less than half of the weight of other engines of comporable power--more likely it was 17 hp at 20 - 25 lb, still good stats. But I've seen it listed in three more places as only 17 lbs or thereabouts including he http://www.ultralightnews.com/limbach/limbachl275e.htm Holy crap! How does Limbach do that? Now, since it develops max power at 7300 rpm you'd need a 2:1 speed reduction or so to use a 48" prop, effectively, right? Supposing the speed reducer DOUBLES the weight, it's still pretty darned impressive. According to what I can find on the history of Limbach, the design is based on a VW, but is built from the ground up to be an airplane engine. So, what is the down side to these engines? Do they cost a gazillion dollars or blow up at 20 hours or something? There has to be a downside somewhere. -- FF |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Car engine FAA certified for airplane use | Cy Galley | Home Built | 10 | February 6th 04 03:03 PM |
Objective Engine Discussion | Rick Maddy | Home Built | 26 | October 14th 03 04:46 AM |
1710 allison v-12 engine WWII p 38 engine | Holger Stephan | Home Built | 9 | August 21st 03 08:53 AM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |
Gasflow of VW engine | Veeduber | Home Built | 4 | July 14th 03 08:06 AM |