How to Stunt Circle a Barn.

"John Gaquin" wrote
He's baaaa--aaaack!!!!

Yep! At least once-a-year. It's hard to believe that such a
person actually exists, but it seems that he really does exist.

Looking at his home page, (http://llef.tripod.com/eagleson) he
has removed a lot of his personal information that was there
a year or two ago, but his wife's "look at me!" stuff is still
there.

Would you believe that he really IS a pilot???? Hard, I know,
but have a look at this:

N-number : N10GS
Aircraft Serial Number : 15060587
Aircraft Manufacturer : CESSNA
Model : 150D
Engine Manufacturer : CONT MOTOR
Model : 0-200 SERIES
Aircraft Year : 1964
Owner Name : EAGLESON DOUGLAS M
Owner Address : 217 E DEER PARK DR
GAITHERSBURG, MD, 20877
Type of Owner : Individual
Registration Date : 02-Jun-1993
Airworthiness Certificate Type : Standard

He does not appear in the FAA's public pilot database.

We are not the only victims of Douglas' strange posts. Just one
of many posts from the following site:
http://mathforum.com/discuss/sci.math/m/474546/475786

Subject: When does zero exist?
Author: Douglas Eagleson
Date Posted: Jan 22 2003 12:00:34:000AM

Bob Pease wrote:
Doug's stuff is not written in anything resembling standard
English.
Also , he refuses to attempt to answer direct questions.
I don't think he knows what "An algebra" means..
What I get as a poorly expressed opinion , using soi-disant
definitions and
ideas that were put to rest in the sixteenth century, that any
mathematics that does not meet the computational needs of a
Hutterite Farmer in the 19th century is not only useless, but
marginally evil. I'm afraid I'll have to send him to Crank City.

PLONK!!!

RJ Pease

Sorry, the concepts delayed for resolution all were
delayed by the Knox recitation I replied to. The need to
justify the zero number as the symmetry of all functions
was the basis for the judgement of the theory's correctness.

And the reply is to simply say, that the mathematics
is able to be defined differently. And the differential was never
considered correctly in its impact on the numbers system
theory.

What is the impact? Another mathematics is more likely
correcter.

Douglas Eagleson
Gaithersburg, MD USA