![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ine.com, Andrew
Gideon wrote: snip The inevitable comments about how non-MS Windows users are in the minority is going to now erupt, with the usual insensitive clods [0] going on about how those who don't use an MS platform are in a minority and don't matter (when it would be so easy to make it multi-platform - say, by making it web-based). Anyone who goes on about non Microsoft users being a minority, therefore justifying not going to the extra effort (in this case, there would probably be no extra effort had they started off with a multiplatform system in the first place by, say, making it web based) are exceedingly short sighted. Why are they short sighted? Is Microsoft's monopoly going to collapse in the next year or two? Well, probably not. MS will still have 90% of the desktop probably in 5 years time. However, the desktop is going to get less and less important for this kind of thing. Handheld devices are going to get more and more important *especially for an activity that is as inherently mobile as flying and the need to flight plan*. The handheld world has seen what Microsoft did to the desktop world, and are determined not to let it happen to them. Microsoft themselves are a minority player in the mobile phone world. Symbian and J2ME are much bigger, and the majority of mobile phones and devices of their ilk run one or the other or both. The prices of GPRS and EGRPS phones are dropping all the time. Even on the few Windows-based handheld devices, they can't actually run applications compiled for desktop Windows. The instruction set for the CPU is different, and bloated desktop applications don't sit well on a low powered handheld device (where web applications run fine, so long as they aren't bloated out with needless Javascript and graphics) With this kind of application, more and more people are going to want to do it on their mobile phone/PDA especially for something that is inherently mobile like travelling by plane! Travelling by light plane especially is something we do 'travelling light'. I'd (and I'm sure many others - certainly all my pilot friends over here) would rather carry a capable cell phone to get our weather radar rather than a bulky laptop. On my Nokia 6820 phone, I have web short cuts to METARS, TAFs, weather radar, synoptic charts etc. and it's ideal for on the move (like GA, there's compromises like the small screen). A flight planner on the web would be excellent especially if it was designed such as not to exclude mobile users. Making it a Windows desktop only application excludes mobile users. By making their flight planner Windows-only, they have excluded the vast majority of mobile users. I predict that certainly in Britain, the number of non-Wintel (E)GPRS phones will rival the number of desktop PCs within the next couple of years. It'll probably happen in the US too - for everyone going on about how basic cellphone service is in the US - guess where I just bought a tri-band GPRS phone (there are plenty of GSM/GPRS providers now in the US, T-Mobile is one, I think Cingular might be GSM, BICBW). And Jay Honeck, this means you, you'd do well to have a version of your website that's accessable for mobile users :-) Because guess what - people will want to search for a hotel on their cell phone sooner than you think! [0] Just kidding. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Aerobatics | 1 | October 5th 04 10:20 PM |
x-43 Flight | Garrison Hilliard | Military Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 12:42 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004 | Steve House | Piloting | 15 | July 31st 03 06:30 PM |