![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 04:05:48 GMT, "Toks Desalu"
wrote: Can't say for sure, but the structure that supports the C-180 gear box assembly (fore & aft bulkheads/formers, specifically, the aft gear-box bulkhead/former) also supports the lower wing-strut attach point. If the right gear box was torn out of the airplane (from the RH gear-leg striking the Baron at speed), it's entirely possible (indeed, likely) that the lower strut attach point on the RH side was also compromised. Needless to say, the gear legs, gear-boxes (and surrounding structure) was not designed to survive the potential damage caused by striking another aircraft at 140+ knots (plus add whatever the closing speed was of the Baron). Bela P. Havasreti I don't get it. The pilot saw the cessna landing gear and he ducked. I assume the cessna's right gear leg made the impact. What I don't understand is how that plane broke up in flight if only landing gear made the impact? Toks "Sam" wrote in message . com... See the story he http://www.avweb.com/newswire/10_13a.../186939-1.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |