![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it really depends on your expected usage. If you fly a lot to a
lot of different places, you could save some money with the airchart system and have a good service to boot. If you are a local yokel it is certainly overkill. I subscribed to the VFR topo atlas for two years, and used it for a few "local long distance" flights as well as a very long round-robin from California to the midwest and back. Note that my experience is with the VFR topo atlas (WAC charts) only---someone else will have to do the math with IFR charts. Form factor was not a problem. In fact, I preferred having the charts bound rather than coping with folding and re-folding a full-size sectional or WAC in a small cockpit. It was also fun having access to detailed information about the entire country, and going on lots of mental flights in the living room. The best part was the continual summarized updates. Every four weeks I got a card in the mail that had all of the updates for that cycle summarized. That alone is worth the price of the ticket---I found it much easier to digest than the same information presented in my local A/FD, and this was for the whole country. There were two down-sides, neither of which had to do with their business. One, I don't much care for the WAC format---identifiers and frequencies are missing, and the scale is out far enough that the charts are difficult to use in mountainous country. Sectionals are much preferred for low-level flying, listening to AWOS reports en route, and topographical information. I got stuck in a canyon in New Mexico because it was unclear from the charts how high the ridge was that I was trying to cross, and it was on a page boundary. Not a big deal in my case, but I could see it being dangerous---in the future I will always use sectionals for mountain flying. My guess is that their new sectional atlases will take care of this problem. The other problem is one of economics, for me at least. I don't actually NEED detailed maps of the entire country, or even half of it. 99% of my flying at this point is local, such that one sectional, one TAC, and one A/FD subscription fulfills all my needs, and at a lower cost than the Airchart subscription. Surprisingly, I don't actually save that much---2 sectionals in a year are $16, 2 TACs are another $8, and 12 A/FDs at $4.50 apiece add up to $54, for a total of $78. So in reality I am only saving $30, about an hour's flying in my plane. Although, if I don't buy an A/FD I will need FlightGuide or something similar for airport information, so add another $25 to the Airchart side. If I do gear up (no pun intended) for a long trip in the future I will very likely purchase a sectional atlas. I saw an ad in AOPA for www.airchart.com . Does anyone have any experience |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
~ BUSH'S EVER SKYROCKETING OIL STOCK CHART ~ | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 2 | September 17th 04 07:09 PM |
Enroute chart question.. | chris priest | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | August 10th 04 01:05 AM |
NavCanada chart subscriptions | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | March 29th 04 12:36 AM |
WAC Chart Images on line? | Rich | Owning | 5 | March 22nd 04 11:17 PM |
Chart subscriptions | Dave Anderer | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | February 28th 04 11:23 PM |