![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Barnyard BOb wrote: WHEN/IF auto conversions prove to be equal or better than the certified stuff, the insurance companies will be the first to know it...... and the rates to reflect it. As it stands now, aviation insurance companies, in general, want nothing to do with auto conversion power at any price. A bold statement sir, certainly worthy of BOb at his bubble busting best. Not bold at all, but.... Bubble busting, for sure, if you get denied insurance solely because of a questionable engine choice. Sing your praises of auto conversions to the insurance companies and see where you get. Probably the same place as EAA got with Avemco!!!!! Please don't quibble further on this insurance angle. Check with 5 aviation insurance companies and then get back here and report what they FULLY & FACTUALLY have to say concerning FULL COVERAGE for auto conversions. That doesn't mean there's no need for conversions, that's being driven by the extreme prices for certified aviation engines. As long as the price for such engines remains high, there will always be people trying to find a different way. NEED is the worst possible motive. When need overrules one's ability and finances, how far behind can disaster be? It's actually a very American trait to use innovation to solve a problem. Ignorance and stupidity are very American, with no shortage in sight. You've been a prominant naysayer for many many years now, basically since the beginning of the discussion back in the 80's. While you've been saying no, more and more auto conversions have taken to the air. How many have to successfully fly for you to be satisfied that the auto conversion is a viable alternative? Your muddleheaded perspective concerning me continues unabated. I've never ever been against auto conversions. However.... I am stridently REACTIVE to outrageous and unprovable claims made by hate mongers of Lycoming, et all. Those that cast certified engines in a bad light while praising how much better auto conversions are, will most likely hear from me. If you don't want me fastidiously defending the honor of certified engines, simply cease and desist the auto conversion bull****. Reign in the hate mongers. Your beef is with them, if you want to hear less of me on this subject. Without certifiable data, anything said against certified engines, is suspect. Since you cannot prove your case about how wonderful auto conversions are compared to certified engines, give it a rest and just build the damn things. Leave the negative crap out of the sales pitches here and you will not have to whine about my whining. What exactly are your criteria? Corky Scott Similar to the aviation insurance industry. Barnyard BOb - figures can lie and liars can figure |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Car engine FAA certified for airplane use | Cy Galley | Home Built | 10 | February 6th 04 03:03 PM |
Objective Engine Discussion | Rick Maddy | Home Built | 26 | October 14th 03 04:46 AM |
harley engine | Air Methods Corporation | Home Built | 1 | September 21st 03 08:13 PM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |
Gasflow of VW engine | Veeduber | Home Built | 4 | July 14th 03 08:06 AM |