![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vince, I'm not sure WWII training was as dangerous as that of WWI. I
don't see how it could have been. The trainers of WWI were a hodgepodge of many types and few things were normalised as they are now. They stalled abrubtly, had extremely steep power off descent and were very unstable on the ground. In addition, the unreliability of the engines was legendary. For a while, few individuals understood how much training was necessary to qualify a person as a bonified pilot. I agree with that, Corky. In addition, pilots were reportedly put into operational types such as Camels and sent into combat with very few logged hours. We had somewhat more than 200 hours in SNJs, including formation, instrument and ACM flying and carrier qualification, before getting into an operational type. Had the Navy put us into F4Us with only 20 or 30 hours in SNJs, no doubt most cadets would have killed themselves. (It was called the "Ensign Eliminator" in any case.) But the point I was making is that grossly exaggerated claims were made about the fatality rate during WW II, and I am skeptical about them, and therefore about WW I too. vince norris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
To Tarver Engineering | fudog50 | Military Aviation | 2 | January 9th 04 07:15 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
sopwith camel kill/loss ratio | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 35 | October 24th 03 06:10 PM |