![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
news ![]() They wouldn't print them if they planned to eliminate them. Baloney. Temporary airspace has been charted in the past and subsequently eliminated, and there's no reason to think that charting it today necessarily means there's no eventual plan to eliminate the temporary airspace charted now. At best, charting the airspace suggests that they expect it to remain at least another six months, and even that is being generous, since it's easy enough to tell pilots "you know that airspace on the chart? well, no need to worry about it anymore". Frankly, I think it's ridiculous that it's taken so long for the TFRs to get charted. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WAC vs Sectional | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 60 | February 8th 05 12:22 AM |
WAC vs Sectional | [email protected] | General Aviation | 12 | February 2nd 05 03:03 PM |
Are sectional paths correct across "long" distances? | vincent p. norris | Piloting | 36 | March 25th 04 02:32 PM |
AVIATIONTOOLBOX: how I convert sectional maps to map chunks | Kyler Laird | General Aviation | 2 | December 4th 03 01:09 AM |
Old New York Sectional | PaulaJay1 | Owning | 2 | November 25th 03 03:27 AM |