![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the unlikely event that a flight is questioned by the FAA, they will base
their findings largely on what the passenger perceives. If your passenger believes (or mistakenly says because he doesn't understand the issues) that the flight only took place because he wanted to go somewhere, they could bust you. If you both can establish a shared purpose, or you can establish that you would have gone anyway for your own reasons and your passenger just tagged along, the passenger can pay for half of the direct costs (or one third if there are three in the plane, etc.) These costs can not include insurance, depreciation, maintenance, etc. and the pilot must pay his share as well. The key is to be sure your passengers know what to say, i.e. "He was coming down and said I could come."; Not, "I asked him to fly me down and he agreed." It would be hard to explain your passenger paying for part of a leg he was not on. These questions often generate long threads because there is a big disconnect between the narrow legality, common sense, and real world enforcement. It is technically a violation for a non-commercial pilot to move a friend's airplane to another airport. The free flight time can be considered compensation because it could be valuable in getting an advanced rating or a flying job. I asked my local FSDO about this and they said, "That's nuts. Where did you ever hear anything as wacky as that?" I faxed them the cite and the opinion letter and they called back to say that I was right. They also said that they were far too busy and reasonable to every worry about something like that. However, if it came to the FAA's attention that you had "friends" all over the region and were wracking up 50 - 100 hours a month of free time moving airplanes while you were clearly building time to go for a commercial license, they might yank your chain. The narrow interpretations are often pulled out when the FAA has other reasons for trying to shut someone down on the "charging Al Capone with tax evasion" principle. If you are an otherwise low profile pilot, you can get away with a lot. If a cute interpretation of the rules is making your flying substantially less expensive, you are probably over the line and could have a problem. Be wary about flying into big events like the Super Bowl. There are often random ramp checks to rope in pilots trying to make a quick buck. If you haven't briefed your passengers on what to say, you could get into trouble on an otherwise legit flight. -- Roger Long |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | February 3rd 04 03:01 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |