![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:53:15 -0700, "PAW"
wrote: This is a BS question, but I'm curious. ![]() I was looking at some hydraulic motors the other day and was wondering if a pump and motor could be used to drive a prop. A crazy example; two hydraulic motors and a couple pumps (powered with a mazda 13b maybe ??) to power something like a Cessna 337 in-line thrust type aircraft. Understanding weight would be an issue, I'm wondering how it would, or could ,work. I was looking at an Eaton motor that was rated at (up to) 3200 RPM @ about 120 ft. lb of torque. Weight was 20 lbs. They have a pump (48 lbs) that moves 42 gpm @ 4000 psi. Is it possible? Single place would be fine. ![]() So the engine drives a pump and the pump drives a hydraulic motor, and the motor spins the prop, right? I'm thinking of the homebuilt designers maxim: "Build it light and simplicate." In addition, you've got the prop spinning at 3200 rpm which is kind of high and will mean a smallish, noisy propeller that doesn't produce much low speed thrust, which means long takeoff runs. In addition, the weight of the items you mention will likely be higher because you will need some means of cooling the oil, as it will be working hard. There will also be the weight of the oil lines. I'm not an expert but since you asked, here's a guess: Airplane designers are a particularly ingenious lot. If it were possible to utilize such a prop drive as you describe, I think someone would probably have tried it by now. After all, we've had virtually every other manner of providing thrust including photovoltaic cells coupled to electric motors. My guess is that your idea might work, albeit extremely marginally and heat rejection will be a major issue, as will be efficiency due to all the pumping losses incurred building pressure and converting the pressure to rotational thrust. All for, in my opinion, relatively low propeller thrust. I'll bet a good mechanical engineer could compute the relative efficiency of this design vs. a direct drive prop or PSRU driven prop. That should be relatively painless and you'd know before buying any pieces if this would be worth it or not. Corky Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Warp Drive Propeller | Jean-Paul Roy | Home Built | 0 | May 13th 04 01:28 AM |
Warp drive or other ground adjustable props | Wallace Berry | Home Built | 0 | March 10th 04 04:02 PM |
The Dean Drive - was Antigrav | Felger Carbon | Home Built | 0 | February 10th 04 01:27 AM |
WTB VW Type I Reduction Drive | Alan | Home Built | 0 | January 2nd 04 04:14 AM |
Any Canadians Who Can Provide Numbers on a Champ, Taylorcraft, or Luscombe with Warp Drive Propeller? | Larry Smith | Home Built | 7 | December 21st 03 09:39 PM |