![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jon Kraus" wrote in message
... http://www.aso.com/i.aso/AircraftVie...craft_id=84399 I flew this yesterday and it was nice (but what the hell do I know) He is asking 105k but Vref says it is worth $113k. That seemed high but again what do I know. Any Mooney owners out there want to give an opinion on the M20J? Thanks in advance. If you're in the market for a fast, fuel-efficient single-engined tourer, there are 4 reasons not to buy a Mooney: 1) It doesn't haul as much payload over short ranges as some comparable tourers. On ours, one the IFR equipment was on board, it was 480 lb with full fuel, which means 670 lb with half fuel. Of course half-fuel still keeps you in the air for 3 hours at 160 KTAS. By the time you get to longer range missions, it matters less because the others have to carry more weight in fuel. If most of your missions are two up, no problem. 2) It doesn't like rough surfaces. In my part of the world there are a much greater proportion of grass runways than in the US. I've landed on grass, it's OK, but I'd be very reluctant to base a Mooney at a grass field as I'd be worried about the prop the whole time. If you don't intend to operate on grass, it's not an issue. 3) Its landing distance is greater than many compatible tourers: because the airframe is clean, it floats. So for short fields it tends to be the landing distance that is limiting. I wouldn't want to operate a M20J regularly out of much less than 2700 ft as you don't have much safety margin at less than that. If you have that and don't visit short strips very often, no problem. 4) Its crosswind performance is ugly, particularly for take-offs. The undercarriage uses rubber disks for its springs, and the wing is very low to the ground. Hence any bumps and you lose any side force from the wheels, and you have a lot of lift relatively early in the take-off roll. If you operate an M20J from a single runway airport in a windy part of the world, this may be an issue. If you only rarely have to deal with 20 knot crosswinds, no problem. If none of those things bother you, just buy the aircraft and spend 12 years, like me, enjoying 160 knots on 10 gallons per hour and trying to figure out why anyone would buy anything else. :-) Julian Scarfe |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Opinions on a M20J | Jon Kraus | Owning | 62 | September 17th 04 12:12 AM |
Opinions on Cessna 340, 414 and 421 | john szpara | Owning | 55 | April 2nd 04 09:08 PM |
Opinions wanted | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 65 | January 21st 04 04:15 AM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Owning | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Piloting | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |