![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Greg Butler" writes:
Right, what I was talking about was the new law that makes an electronic copy of the check just as legal as the original, thus eliminating the need for delivery of cancelled checks. You're referring to "CHECK21", the short name for the legislation formally titled "Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act". As noted elsewhere in this thread the main impact of this act is to allow a paper check to be converted to an electronic image at any point in its travel within the banking system. Unfortunately, what you (as the customer of your bank) receive with your monthly statement isn't necessarily as good as a real, paper check. Some banks are returning to you documents formally called "substitute checks", but others are merely giving you images that have little legal significance if you have a dispute. It's easy to tell the difference. The law is specific about a document described as a "subsitute check": * It must accurately represent all of the information on the front and back of the original check as of the time the original check was "truncated" (i.e., converted to an image) [section 4(b)(1)(2003) of the Check21 Act] * It must contain a legend stating "This is a legal copy of your check. You can use it the same way you would use the original check" [section 4(b)(2)] As far as I can tell, an image that is not a substitute check has no intrinsic legal standing, although I would expect that for typical routine transactions a merchant would probably want to accept such an image as proof as long as there is no suggestion of fraud. Banks that don't routinely provide you with substitute checks can charge you whatever they want should you need one. What's more, the banks are required to retain the images for only seven years, and can (and probably will) destroy the files after that time. There is no requirement that they have any mechanism to obtain substitute checks after that point, regardless of the customer's need to prove a payment, nor any requirement that the customer be able to bulk-download the images. Good references: http://www.consumerlaw.org/initiativ...1_content.html http://www.consumersunion.org/finance/ckclear1002.htm Joe Morris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Changes in Instrument Proficiency Check Requirements | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 71 | June 10th 04 08:02 PM |
Use of hand-held GPS on FAA check ride | Barry | Piloting | 3 | August 9th 03 10:14 PM |
Use of hand-held GPS on FAA check ride | Barry | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | August 9th 03 09:25 PM |
check your tachometer | Robert Scott | Home Built | 0 | August 4th 03 05:05 PM |