A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Corky's engine choice



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old July 25th 03, 05:22 PM
Corky Scott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 24 Jul 2003 18:56:58 -0700, (Jay) wrote:

Hey Corky,

What was your beef with the 13B? I have to replace a car coming off
lease in the next few months and I'm seriously looking at older RX-7s
just to get a flavor for the power plant.

I like the idea of a no-seize failure mode and the idea of it being 2
co-axial engines in one. The higher fuel burn I can deal with,
especially since its mogas.

I initially liked the engine for all the reasons you and many others
liked it. But as I tore it apart and rebuilt it, I started to have
doubts. I didn't have doubts about the engine durability, the doubts
I had were about living with it when it was done.

I had the engine some 10 years ago and at that time, the only real
choice for a PSRU was Ross Aero. Lou Ross was a raconteur and loved
to go on about how people over engineer things and that keeping stuff
simple was the best way. During this time, there was another company
trying to use the Mazda engine and they were running into huge
problems with torsional vibration. They spent years engineering and
machining until they finally got something that would last longer than
a few minutes without braking the prop right off.

This was unnerving, although Lou said nothing of the sort was
happening with his gearbox.

So I sat down and wrote down all the pluses I could think of and all
the minuses. There were a lot more minuses than pluses.

On the debit side were the following:

1. I have to fabricate a new intake manifold.
2. The exhaust system runs some 400 to 500 degrees hotter than a four
stroke cycle engine.
3. Fuel milage appeared to be somewhat worse than a four stroke cycle
engine of similar power.
4. The recommendation was to remove the oil injector pump (this is the
pump that drips oil into the intake manifold to lubricate the rotor
tip seals) This meant that you had to carry oil you would be adding
to the fuel tanks. This also meant that you had to calculate how much
oil you had to add to the tanks every time you refueled.
5. The engine is unbelievably loud sounding like a cross between a two
stroke motorcycle dragster and chainsaw held next to your head. There
would definately be a need for a muffler.

On the plus side, it was an engine that was close to being
indestructable. Even if it blew a seal it would have run till you
landed. Would not have started again, but it would get you down.

I pictured myself having to refuel more frequently and having to add
oil to the tanks and decided that I really didn't want to do that.

In the end, I felt it was better to deal with the devil you knew than
the devil you didn't know.

Corky Scott
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Engine weights Salem Farm & Garden Home Built 5 July 22nd 03 04:27 AM
Gasflow of VW engine Veeduber Home Built 4 July 14th 03 08:06 AM
Continental A65 engine Philippe Vessaire Home Built 0 July 10th 03 05:49 PM
mercedes engine Joa Home Built 1 July 8th 03 12:26 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.