![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 09:30:10 -0500, "James M. Knox"
wrote: "Bill Daniels" wrote in : I was shocked to see a Schweitzer 2-33 glider with a homebuilt airworthiness certificate. The glider was assembled with parts from two or more gliders and recovered with new fabric. There are a few strange but trivial modifications to the original design but it is still a 2-33. It's very hard for me to see that the rebuilders did 51% of the work. Yet it has a homebuilt experimental airworthiness certificate. One note on that... the rules changed some years back. It used to be that you had to do 51% of the work. Now you only have to do 51% of the TASKS, i.e. the number of different things required to build the craft. That is what has allowed all the "quick build" kits to be legal. For example, you don't have to make 200 wing ribs. You can make ONE wing rib, and the factory can make all the others, and it counts the I thought I'd had lots of practice with fiberglass when I started, but although my early work was plenty sufficient and strong, it's easy to see the difference between my early work and the current. same. The theory being that the homebuilt rule is there for education, and you don't get much additional learning making wing rib #183. G So it's *possible* to do a *lot* of significant things to an airframe and meet the 51% rule, even though it looked like the plane was pretty much there to begin with. [Some "quick build" kits have the basic wings and fuselage halves already made. Stick those four parts together and I think you will find that the "Jump Start" Glasair-III has a lot more than that. (Unfortunately I can't get the Newglasair site to come up today.) As I recall the fuselage halves are joined, the fire wall is in, and the engine mount reinforcements are done. The wing is ready for the flaps and ailerons and the horizontal stab is about ready to close. They save you about 1000 hours or so... However considering the G-III is one of the most labor intensive "kits" out there, you still have a long ways to go. A little more work and I'll be up to the point where my G-III will be as far as a "Jump Start" kit out of the box. sigh Course, mine didn't cost any where near what the Jump start kit does and I have an engine and prop. Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member) www.rogerhalstead.com N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2) it looks like an airplane - but there is still a WHOLE LOT of work left to do. As someone said, it's all about finding a friendly FSDO. ----------------------------------------------- James M. Knox TriSoft ph 512-385-0316 1109-A Shady Lane fax 512-366-4331 Austin, Tx 78721 ----------------------------------------------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |