|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#14
January 27th 05, 08:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Peter Clark wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:16:49 GMT, Dave S wrote: A couple freight dog companies out there are cryin in their beer right now.. they figured the govt would flinch and not go LIVE like they said they would be... Are they unable to get waivers per 91(g)(5) (operator submits request for waiver and at flight plan filing time ATC determines old-style separation rules can be used)? For the night-op freight stuff I wouldn't think traffic volume would be an issue? Peter, See my previous post on this subject. The waivers are available to only a select few, specialized operators. The vast majority of us do not qualify, and thus are not even allowed to *ask* for clearance. Happy Flying! Scott Skylane 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Strange Class D boundary??? | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 2 | August 30th 04 02:56 PM |
| Strange engine event | Paul Mennen | Owning | 33 | July 9th 04 04:42 AM |
| Strange one about the 296 | kage | Piloting | 0 | June 13th 04 02:42 AM |
| Strange lost-comm situation | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | May 4th 04 04:11 AM |
| Really strange going-on with radios | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 3 | March 15th 04 01:52 PM |
Threaded Mode