A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is Chris Thomas a Real Pilot?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old August 25th 04, 12:26 PM
PAW
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "PAW"
Date: 8/25/2004 1:22 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From:
osite (RobertR237)
Date: 8/23/2004 8:51 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:



From: " jls"

Date: 8/23/2004 7:10 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm

I got as far as the ARPC gag. For those who never served during that

time
frame
let me explain. The site said Bush never finished his 6 year

commitment.
The
authour has no idea what that means. During that time ALL males 18

and
over
had
a 6 year obligation unless excused for valid reasons (conscientious
objector,
medical etc). This means if one signed up for 3 years active duty in

the
Army
and completed those 3 years and got out he STILL had 3 years inactive
reserves
before being released. If Bush didn't serve his 6 years in either

Guard,
active
or reserves the remaining time was INACTIVE reserve.

The six year obligation was the same for officers, warrants and

enlisteds.

As an aside retirees have a 10 year inactive reserve obligation upon
retirement.

Think what you want about Bush, but wild accusations and name calling

proves
absoultely nothing.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


On the contrary Dan, I proves a great deal...just not about Bush.


Bob Reed


I hadn't look at it that way. You are correct.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


Any of you guys recall NG's with 4 year active reserve commitments in

the
late 60's, early 70's? I don't. Every single NG I knew was on 6 year

ACTIVE
reserve status. I'm sure many of them would have enjoyed getting cut

loose
early too.

Phil


The commitment was a total of 6 years. I know people who did Guard fo 6

years
and and some who did 4 years. Never having done Guard I'm not sure how

they did
it.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


Nobody (other than GW Bush) went through flightschool (during that time
period) with a 4 year NG commitment. I served my time, why couldn't Bush
serve his? Why couldn't he maintain flight status? We know he likes to
fly.... at least out to aircraft carriers playing pilot dressup. Gw's
commitment was for 6 years of ACTIVE TANG and he didn't finish it. In the
meantime, men were being drafted and sent to war.

Dan, were you in the service prior to 75?

Phil


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
I wonder if Chris Thomas is a real pilot? Anybody know? Badwater Bill Home Built 116 September 3rd 04 05:43 PM
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? Badwater Bill Home Built 3 June 23rd 04 04:05 PM
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 41 November 20th 03 05:39 AM
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation Gilan Home Built 17 September 24th 03 06:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.