![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aviation Consumer just published their thoughts on these portable
collision devices including the Monroy ATD-300, TrafficScope VRX, and Proxalert R5. I thought I would share the results as I read them. Their overall opinion rests with the Trafficscope for functionality, and places the Proxalert at the bottom. I have flown with the Monroy and Trafficscope, and can agree with them that having an altimeter within the device seems to make a lot of difference. I have been using the Trafficscope for a while now and can attest to its abilities. They made reference to the Garmin Mode-S system of traffic avoidance, and claimed it is far superior. I would agree that any thing which gives 3 dimensional views is a plus, however, they fail to mention any price tags. I looked into installing the garmin 330 with a 430 display update and it would set me back about $17,500. For that price it better give me really accurate info. One thing that does confuse me is the service ability. From what I read they can give 3D info within a certain volume by using the Mode "S" transponder. What I realized is that if I travel outside this area I will be blind to other traffic. This may be a correct assumption or possibly not, I welcome feedback. For now however, my Trafficscope seems to do the trick very well. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|